CCPortal
Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing
Judson, Richard1; Kavlock, Robert1; Martin, Matthew1; Reif, David1; Houck, Keith1; Knudsen, Thomas1; Richard, Ann1; Tice, Raymond R.2; Whelan, Maurice3; Xia, Menghang4; Huang, Ruili4; Austin, Christopher4; Daston, George5; Hartung, Thomas6; Fowle, John R., III; Wooge, William7; Tong, Weida8; Dix, David1
发表日期2013
ISSN1868-596X
卷号30期号:1页码:51-66
英文摘要

In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays are seeing increasing use in toxicity testing. HTS assays can simultaneously test many chemicals but have seen limited use in the regulatory arena, in part because of the need to undergo rigorous, time-consuming formal validation. Here we discuss streamlining the validation process, specifically for prioritization applications. By prioritization, we mean a process in which less complex, less expensive, and faster assays are used to prioritize which chemicals are subjected first to more complex, expensive, and slower guideline assays. Data from the HTS prioritization assays is intended to provide a priori evidence that certain chemicals have the potential to lead to the types of adverse effects that the guideline tests are assessing. The need for such prioritization approaches is driven by the fact that there are tens of thousands of chemicals to which people are exposed, but the yearly throughput of most guideline assays is small in comparison. The streamlined validation process would continue to ensure the reliability and relevance of assays for this application. We discuss the following practical guidelines: (1) follow current validation practice to the extent possible and practical; (2) make increased use of reference compounds to better demonstrate assay reliability and relevance; (3) de-emphasize the need for cross-laboratory testing; and (4) implement a web-based, transparent, and expedited peer review process.


英文关键词validation;in vitro;high-throughput screening
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000315012800005
来源期刊ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61593
作者单位1.US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA;
2.NIEHS, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA;
3.Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, EURL ECVAM, I-21020 Ispra, Italy;
4.Natl Ctr Adv Translat Sci, Rockville, MD USA;
5.Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH USA;
6.Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA;
7.US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA;
8.US FDA, Jefferson, AR USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Judson, Richard,Kavlock, Robert,Martin, Matthew,et al. Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing[J]. 美国环保署,2013,30(1):51-66.
APA Judson, Richard.,Kavlock, Robert.,Martin, Matthew.,Reif, David.,Houck, Keith.,...&Dix, David.(2013).Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing.ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION,30(1),51-66.
MLA Judson, Richard,et al."Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing".ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION 30.1(2013):51-66.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Judson, Richard]的文章
[Kavlock, Robert]的文章
[Martin, Matthew]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Judson, Richard]的文章
[Kavlock, Robert]的文章
[Martin, Matthew]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Judson, Richard]的文章
[Kavlock, Robert]的文章
[Martin, Matthew]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。