Climate Change Data Portal
Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing | |
Judson, Richard1; Kavlock, Robert1; Martin, Matthew1; Reif, David1; Houck, Keith1; Knudsen, Thomas1; Richard, Ann1; Tice, Raymond R.2; Whelan, Maurice3; Xia, Menghang4; Huang, Ruili4; Austin, Christopher4; Daston, George5; Hartung, Thomas6; Fowle, John R., III; Wooge, William7; Tong, Weida8; Dix, David1 | |
发表日期 | 2013 |
ISSN | 1868-596X |
卷号 | 30期号:1页码:51-66 |
英文摘要 | In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays are seeing increasing use in toxicity testing. HTS assays can simultaneously test many chemicals but have seen limited use in the regulatory arena, in part because of the need to undergo rigorous, time-consuming formal validation. Here we discuss streamlining the validation process, specifically for prioritization applications. By prioritization, we mean a process in which less complex, less expensive, and faster assays are used to prioritize which chemicals are subjected first to more complex, expensive, and slower guideline assays. Data from the HTS prioritization assays is intended to provide a priori evidence that certain chemicals have the potential to lead to the types of adverse effects that the guideline tests are assessing. The need for such prioritization approaches is driven by the fact that there are tens of thousands of chemicals to which people are exposed, but the yearly throughput of most guideline assays is small in comparison. The streamlined validation process would continue to ensure the reliability and relevance of assays for this application. We discuss the following practical guidelines: (1) follow current validation practice to the extent possible and practical; (2) make increased use of reference compounds to better demonstrate assay reliability and relevance; (3) de-emphasize the need for cross-laboratory testing; and (4) implement a web-based, transparent, and expedited peer review process. |
英文关键词 | validation;in vitro;high-throughput screening |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000315012800005 |
来源期刊 | ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61593 |
作者单位 | 1.US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA; 2.NIEHS, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA; 3.Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, EURL ECVAM, I-21020 Ispra, Italy; 4.Natl Ctr Adv Translat Sci, Rockville, MD USA; 5.Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH USA; 6.Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA; 7.US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA; 8.US FDA, Jefferson, AR USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Judson, Richard,Kavlock, Robert,Martin, Matthew,et al. Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing[J]. 美国环保署,2013,30(1):51-66. |
APA | Judson, Richard.,Kavlock, Robert.,Martin, Matthew.,Reif, David.,Houck, Keith.,...&Dix, David.(2013).Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing.ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION,30(1),51-66. |
MLA | Judson, Richard,et al."Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing".ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION 30.1(2013):51-66. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。