CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.forpol.2017.07.002
Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework
Eggers, Jeannette1; Holmgren, Sara2; Nordstrom, Eva-Maria1; Lamas, Tomas1; Lind, Torgny1; Ohman, Karin1
发表日期2019
ISSN1389-9341
EISSN1872-7050
卷号103页码:55-69
英文摘要

Besides traditional timber production, other forest functions, such as biodiversity and recreation, have gained increasing importance during the last few decades. Demands on forests have become more diversified, thus making forest management and planning more complex. To meet these challenges, there is a growing interest in a more diversified silviculture, for which a number of different management options are available. However, it remains unclear how the various management options affect economic, ecological, and social aspects of sustainable forest management. Hence, in this study, we assess the consequences of various management options on different aspects of sustainable forest management through scenario analysis using a forestry decision support system. We evaluate 10 different forest management scenarios for two contrasting municipalities in Sweden, based on expert participation by way of a web-based multi-criteria decision analysis framework. We asked experts in economic, ecological, and social forest values, as well as those in reindeer husbandry, to weigh a number of indicators in their field of expertise against each other, and to create value functions for each indicator. We then determined scenario ranking for different sets of weights for economic, ecological and social forest values. Our results indicate that current management practices are favorable for economic aspects (wood production), while a number of scenarios would be better suited to fulfill the Swedish co-equal forest policy goal of production and consideration of environmental issues, such as scenarios with longer rotation periods, a larger share of set-asides and a higher share of continuous cover forestry. These measures would be beneficial not only for ecological values, but also for social values and for reindeer husbandry. Furthermore, we found that expert participation through the web-tool was a promising alternative to physical meetings that require more commitment in terms of time and resources.


WOS研究方向Business & Economics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Forestry
来源期刊FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/98894
作者单位1.Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Resource Management, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden;
2.Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Unit Forest Policy, POB 7008, SE-75651 Uppsala, Sweden
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Eggers, Jeannette,Holmgren, Sara,Nordstrom, Eva-Maria,et al. Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework[J],2019,103:55-69.
APA Eggers, Jeannette,Holmgren, Sara,Nordstrom, Eva-Maria,Lamas, Tomas,Lind, Torgny,&Ohman, Karin.(2019).Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework.FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS,103,55-69.
MLA Eggers, Jeannette,et al."Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework".FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS 103(2019):55-69.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Eggers, Jeannette]的文章
[Holmgren, Sara]的文章
[Nordstrom, Eva-Maria]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Eggers, Jeannette]的文章
[Holmgren, Sara]的文章
[Nordstrom, Eva-Maria]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Eggers, Jeannette]的文章
[Holmgren, Sara]的文章
[Nordstrom, Eva-Maria]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。