CCPortal
DOI10.1080/17477891.2019.1608148
An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society
Hudson, P.1; De Ruig, L. T.2; de Ruiter, M. C.2; Kuik, O. J.2; Botzen, W. J. W.2,3,4; Le Den, X.5; Persson, M.5; Benoist, A.5; Nielsen, C. N.5
发表日期2019
ISSN1747-7891
EISSN1878-0059
英文摘要

Extreme weather resilience has been defined as being based on three pillars: resistance (the ability to lower impacts), recovery (the ability to bounce back), and adaptive capacity (the ability to learn and improve). These resilience pillars are important both before and after the occurrence of extreme weather events. Extreme weather insurance can influence these pillars of resilience depending on how particular insurance mechanisms are structured. We explore how the lessons learnt from the current best insurance practices can improve resilience to extreme weather events. We employ an extensive inventory of private property and agricultural crop insurance mechanisms to conduct a multi-criteria analysis of insurance market outcomes. We draw conclusions regarding the patterns in the best practice from six European countries to increase resilience. We suggest that requirements to buy a bundle extreme weather event insurance with general insurance packages are strengthened and supported with structures to financing losses through public-private partnerships. Moreover, support for low income households through income vouchers could be provided. Similarly, for the agricultural sector we propose moving towards comprehensive crop yield insurance linked to general agricultural subsidies. In both cases a nationally representative body can coordinate the various stakeholders into acting in concert.


WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/96626
作者单位1.Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Potsdam, Germany;
2.Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
3.Univ Utrecht, Sch Econ USE, Utrecht, Netherlands;
4.Univ Penn, Risk Management & Decis Proc Ctr, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA;
5.Ramboll Consulting, Copenhagen S, Denmark
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hudson, P.,De Ruig, L. T.,de Ruiter, M. C.,et al. An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society[J],2019.
APA Hudson, P..,De Ruig, L. T..,de Ruiter, M. C..,Kuik, O. J..,Botzen, W. J. W..,...&Nielsen, C. N..(2019).An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society.ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS.
MLA Hudson, P.,et al."An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society".ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hudson, P.]的文章
[De Ruig, L. T.]的文章
[de Ruiter, M. C.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hudson, P.]的文章
[De Ruig, L. T.]的文章
[de Ruiter, M. C.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hudson, P.]的文章
[De Ruig, L. T.]的文章
[de Ruiter, M. C.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。