CCPortal
DOI10.10161/j.scitotenv.2019.01.286
Comparison of the alternative models SOURCE and SWAT for predicting catchment streamflow, sediment and nutrient loads under the effect of land use changes
Hong Hanh Nguyen1; Recknagel, Friedrich1; Meyer, Wayne1; Frizenschaf, Jacqueline2; Ying, He3; Gibbs, Matthew S.4,5
发表日期2019
ISSN0048-9697
EISSN1879-1026
卷号662页码:254-265
英文摘要

Quantifying the water quantity and quality variations resulting from human induced activities is important for policy makers in view of increasing water scarcity and water pollution. Simple models can be robust tools in estimating the runoff from catchments, but do they also sufficiently reflect complex physio-chemical processes required for spatially -explicit simulation of soil -water interactions, and the resulting pollutant responses in catchments? Do these models respond sensitive to the impacts of different land use change representations? These questions are considered by applying the semi -distributed process -based catchment models SWAT and SOURCE to the Sixth Creek catchment in South Australia. Both models used similar data whereas inputs for SOURCE were generated from land -use based Functional Units (FUs), while FUs for SWAT were based on land use, soil and slope combinations. After satisfying calibration of both models for the outlet station of the catchment, the simulated flow by SOURCE produced high goodness of fit metrics, while nutrient loads simulated by SWAT were more realistic. Both models benefitted from using locally available Potential Evapotranspiration data for calibrating the hydrology. Scenarios of intensified land uses by two models showed more credible results for sediment and nutrient loads with the static approach when simulating the linear rather than the non-linear land use changes. The study has shown that informing decisions on the hydrology at catchment scale is well suited to less-complex models, whereas decisions on impact of land use change on water quality in catchments are better suited by models with process descriptions for soil-water interactions. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/96614
作者单位1.Univ Adelaide, Dept Ecol & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia;
2.South Australian Water Corp, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
3.South Australian Environm Protect Author, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
4.Govt South Australia, Dept Environm & Water, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
5.Univ Adelaide, Sch Civil Environm & Min Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hong Hanh Nguyen,Recknagel, Friedrich,Meyer, Wayne,et al. Comparison of the alternative models SOURCE and SWAT for predicting catchment streamflow, sediment and nutrient loads under the effect of land use changes[J],2019,662:254-265.
APA Hong Hanh Nguyen,Recknagel, Friedrich,Meyer, Wayne,Frizenschaf, Jacqueline,Ying, He,&Gibbs, Matthew S..(2019).Comparison of the alternative models SOURCE and SWAT for predicting catchment streamflow, sediment and nutrient loads under the effect of land use changes.SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,662,254-265.
MLA Hong Hanh Nguyen,et al."Comparison of the alternative models SOURCE and SWAT for predicting catchment streamflow, sediment and nutrient loads under the effect of land use changes".SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 662(2019):254-265.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hong Hanh Nguyen]的文章
[Recknagel, Friedrich]的文章
[Meyer, Wayne]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hong Hanh Nguyen]的文章
[Recknagel, Friedrich]的文章
[Meyer, Wayne]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hong Hanh Nguyen]的文章
[Recknagel, Friedrich]的文章
[Meyer, Wayne]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。