CCPortal
DOI10.1111/nph.15566
Responses of respiration in the light to warming in field-grown trees: a comparison of the thermal sensitivity of the Kok and Laisk methods
Way, Danielle A.1,2; Aspinwall, Michael J.3,4; Drake, John E.3,5; Crous, Kristine Y.3; Campany, Courtney E.3,6; Ghannoum, Oula3; Tissue, David T.3; Tjoelker, Mark G.3
发表日期2019
ISSN0028-646X
EISSN1469-8137
卷号222期号:1页码:132-143
英文摘要

The Kok and Laisk techniques can both be used to estimate light respiration R-light. We investigated whether responses of R-light to short- and long-term changes in leaf temperature depend on the technique used to estimate R-light. We grew Eucalyptus tereticornis in whole-tree chambers under ambient temperature (AT) or AT + 3 degrees C (elevated temperature, ET). We assessed dark respiration R-dark and light respiration with the Kok (R-Kok) and Laisk (R-Laisk) methods at four temperatures to determine the degree of light suppression of respiration using both methods in AT and ET trees. The ET treatment had little impact on R-dark, R-Kok or R-Laisk. Although the thermal sensitivities of R-Kok or R-Laisk were similar, R-Kok was higher than R-Laisk. We found negative values of R-Laisk at the lowest measurement temperatures, indicating positive net CO2 uptake, which we propose may be related to phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity. Light suppression of R-dark decreased with increasing leaf temperature, but the degree of suppression depended on the method used. The Kok and Laisk methods do not generate the same estimates of R-light or light suppression of R-dark between 20 and 35 degrees C. Negative rates of R-Laisk imply that this method may become less reliable at low temperatures.


WOS研究方向Plant Sciences
来源期刊NEW PHYTOLOGIST
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/95527
作者单位1.Univ Western Ontario, Dept Biol, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada;
2.Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, 9 Circuit Dr,Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708 USA;
3.Western Sydney Univ, Hawkesbury Inst Environm, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia;
4.Univ North Florida, Dept Biol, 1 UNF Dr, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA;
5.SUNY ESF, Forest & Nat Resources Management, 1 Forestry Dr, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA;
6.Colgate Univ, Dept Biol, 13 Oak Dr, Hamilton, NY 13346 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Way, Danielle A.,Aspinwall, Michael J.,Drake, John E.,et al. Responses of respiration in the light to warming in field-grown trees: a comparison of the thermal sensitivity of the Kok and Laisk methods[J],2019,222(1):132-143.
APA Way, Danielle A..,Aspinwall, Michael J..,Drake, John E..,Crous, Kristine Y..,Campany, Courtney E..,...&Tjoelker, Mark G..(2019).Responses of respiration in the light to warming in field-grown trees: a comparison of the thermal sensitivity of the Kok and Laisk methods.NEW PHYTOLOGIST,222(1),132-143.
MLA Way, Danielle A.,et al."Responses of respiration in the light to warming in field-grown trees: a comparison of the thermal sensitivity of the Kok and Laisk methods".NEW PHYTOLOGIST 222.1(2019):132-143.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Way, Danielle A.]的文章
[Aspinwall, Michael J.]的文章
[Drake, John E.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Way, Danielle A.]的文章
[Aspinwall, Michael J.]的文章
[Drake, John E.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Way, Danielle A.]的文章
[Aspinwall, Michael J.]的文章
[Drake, John E.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。