气候变化领域集成服务门户

California is expected to experience great spatial/temporal variations evaporation. These variations arise from strong north-south, east-west gradients in rainfall and vegetation, strong interannual variability in rainfall (+/- 30%) and strong seasonal variability in the supply and demand for moisture. We used the Breathing Earth System Simulator to evaluate the rates and sums of evaporation across California, over the 2001-2017 period. Breathing Earth System Simulator is a bottom-up, biophysical model that couples subroutines that calculate the surface energy balance, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance. The model is forced with high-resolution remote sensing data (1 km).The questions we address are as follows: How much water is evaporated across the natural and managed ecosystems of California? How much does evaporation vary during the booms and busts in annual rainfall? and Is evaporation increasing with time due to a warming climate? Mean annual evaporation, averaged over the 2001-2017 period, was relatively steady (393 +/- 21 mm/year) given the high interannual variation in precipitation (519 +/- 140 mm/year). No significant trend in evaporation at the statewide level was detected over this time period, despite a background of a warming climate. Irrigated agricultural crops and orchards, at 1-km scale, use less water than inferred estimates for individual fields. This leaves the potential for sharing water, a scarce resource, more equitably among competing stakeholders, for example, farms, fish, people, and ecosystems.

Plain Language Summary Many stakeholders are contending for the limited water budget that is available to California, the world's fifth largest economy. Yet the amount of water used by natural and managed ecosystems across the state is not well known. We produced a new, process-oriented estimate of statewide water use by natural and managed ecosystems using a biophysical model forced with satellite remote sensing. Despite the booms and busts in rainfall over the 2001 to 2017 period, we find that statewide water use is conservative, compared to the annual variability in rainfall. Nor do we detect that statewide evaporation is increasing as the climate has warmed over this period. We find that crops use less water than conventional wisdom because a subset of fields across a 1-km pixel are fallow and are at peak leaf area and maximum evaporation potential for a relatively short period. Forests, on the other hand, use more water than conventional wisdom because they have a long growing season and absorb more energy than crops. Our intent is to provide water managers with new information on water use to better share water among the various stakeholders, for example, agricultural, cities, fish, ground water reservoirs, and water quality.