CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.220
Environmental impacts of takeaway food containers
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro1,2; Mendoza, Joan Manuel F.1; Azapagic, Adisa1
发表日期2019
ISSN0959-6526
EISSN1879-1786
卷号211页码:417-427
英文摘要

The consumption of takeaway food is increasing worldwide. Single-use containers used for takeaway food represent a significant source of waste and environmental impacts due to their low recyclability. Consequently, it is important to identify the best available alternatives and improvement opportunities to reduce the environmental impacts of fast-food containers. For these purposes, this study estimates and compares for the first time the life cycle impacts of three most widely-used types of takeaway container: aluminium, polypropylene and extruded polystyrene. These are also compared to reusable polypropylene containers. The findings suggest that single-use polypropylene containers are the worst option for seven out of 12 impacts considered, including global warming potential. They are followed by the aluminium alternative with five highest impacts, including depletion of ozone layer and human toxicity. Overall, extruded polystyrene containers have the lowest impacts due to the lower material and electricity requirements in their manufacture. They are also the best option when compared to reused takeaway polypropylene containers, unless the latter are reused 3-39 times. The number of uses needed for the reusable "Tupperware" polypropylene food savers is even higher, ranging from 16 to 208 times, with terrestrial ecotoxicity being always higher than for extruded polystyrene, regardless of the number of uses. However, extruded polystyrene containers are currently not recycled and cannot be considered a sustainable option. If they were recycled in accordance with the European Union 2025 policy on waste packaging, most of their impacts would be reduced by >18%, while also reducing littering and negative effects on marine organisms. Most of the impacts of the other two types of container would also be reduced (>20%) through increased recycling. Implementing the European Union 2025 policy on recycling of waste packaging would reduce all the impacts by 2%-60%, including a 33% reduction in global warming potential. Based on 2025 million takeaway containers used annually in the European Union, the latter would save 61,700 t CO2 eq./yr, equivalent to the emissions of 55,000 light-duty vehicles. The outcomes of this study will be of interest to packaging manufacturers, food outlets, policy makers and consumers. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/93588
作者单位1.Univ Manchester, Sch Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Sustainable Ind Syst, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England;
2.Univ Manchester, Sch Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, HG1,Pariser Bldg,Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro,Mendoza, Joan Manuel F.,Azapagic, Adisa. Environmental impacts of takeaway food containers[J],2019,211:417-427.
APA Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro,Mendoza, Joan Manuel F.,&Azapagic, Adisa.(2019).Environmental impacts of takeaway food containers.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,211,417-427.
MLA Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro,et al."Environmental impacts of takeaway food containers".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 211(2019):417-427.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro]的文章
[Mendoza, Joan Manuel F.]的文章
[Azapagic, Adisa]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro]的文章
[Mendoza, Joan Manuel F.]的文章
[Azapagic, Adisa]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro]的文章
[Mendoza, Joan Manuel F.]的文章
[Azapagic, Adisa]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。