CCPortal
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0211221
Discourses mapped by Q-method show governance constraints motivate landscape approaches in Indonesia
Langston, James Douglas1,2,3; McIntyre, Rowan1,2; Falconer, Keith1; Sunderland, Terry1,3; van Noordwijk, Meine4,5; Boedhihartono, Agni Klintuni2,3
发表日期2019
ISSN1932-6203
卷号14期号:1
英文摘要

Interpreting discourses among implementers of what is termed a "landscape approach" enables us to learn from their experience to improve conservation and development outcomes. We use Q-methodology to explore the perspectives of a group of experts in the landscape approach, both from academic and implementation fields, on what hinderances are in place to the realisation of achieving sustainable landscape management in Indonesia. The results show that, at a generic level, "corruption" and "lack of transparency and accountability" rank as the greatest constraints on landscape functionality. Biophysical factors, such as topography and climate change, rank as the least constraining factors. When participants considered a landscape with which they were most familiar, the results changed: the rapid change of regulations, limited local human capacity and inaccessible data on economic risks increased, while the inadequacy of democratic institutions, "overlapping laws" and "corruption" decreased. The difference indicates some fine-tuning of generic perceptions to the local context and may also reflect different views on what is achievable for landscape approach practitioners. Overall, approximately 55% of variance is accounted for by five discourse factors for each trial. Four overlapped and two discourses were discrete enough to merit different discourse labels. We labelled the discourses (1) social exclusionists, (2) state view, (3) community view, (4) integrationists, (5) democrats, and (6) neoliberals. Each discourse contains elements actionable at the landscape scale, as well as exogenous issues that originate at national and global scales. Actionable elements that could contribute to improving governance included trust building, clarified resource rights and responsibilities, and inclusive representation in management. The landscape sustainability discourses studied here suggests that landscape approach "learners" must focus on ways to remedy poor governance if they are to achieve sustainability and multi-functionality.


WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics
来源期刊PLOS ONE
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/92308
作者单位1.James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Ctr Trop Environm & Sustainabil Sci, Cairns, Qld, Australia;
2.Tanah Air Beta, Tabanan, Bali, Indonesia;
3.Univ British Columbia, Forest Sci Ctr, Fac Forestry, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
4.World Agroforestry Ctr, ICRAF Southeast Asia Reg Off, Bogor, Indonesia;
5.Wageningen Univ & Res, Plant Prod Syst, Wageningen, Netherlands
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Langston, James Douglas,McIntyre, Rowan,Falconer, Keith,et al. Discourses mapped by Q-method show governance constraints motivate landscape approaches in Indonesia[J],2019,14(1).
APA Langston, James Douglas,McIntyre, Rowan,Falconer, Keith,Sunderland, Terry,van Noordwijk, Meine,&Boedhihartono, Agni Klintuni.(2019).Discourses mapped by Q-method show governance constraints motivate landscape approaches in Indonesia.PLOS ONE,14(1).
MLA Langston, James Douglas,et al."Discourses mapped by Q-method show governance constraints motivate landscape approaches in Indonesia".PLOS ONE 14.1(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Langston, James Douglas]的文章
[McIntyre, Rowan]的文章
[Falconer, Keith]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Langston, James Douglas]的文章
[McIntyre, Rowan]的文章
[Falconer, Keith]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Langston, James Douglas]的文章
[McIntyre, Rowan]的文章
[Falconer, Keith]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。