CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.09.018
Implications of crop model ensemble size and composition for estimates of adaptation effects and agreement of recommendations
Rodriguez, A.1,2; Ruiz-Ramos, M.1; Palosuo, T.3; Carter, T. R.4; Fronzek, S.4; Lorite, I. J.5; Ferrise, R.6; Pirttioja, N.4; Bindi, M.6; Baranowski, P.7; Buis, S.8; Cammarano, D.9; Chen, Y.3; Dumont, B.10; Ewert, F.11; Gaiser, T.11; Hlavinka, P.12,13; Hoffmann, H.11; Hohn, J. G.3; Jurecka, F.12,13; Kersebaum, K. C.14; Krzyszczak, J.7; Lana, M.14,15; Mechiche-Alami, A.16; Minet, J.17; Montesino, M.18; Nendel, C.14; Porter, J. R.18; Ruget, F.8; Semenov, M. A.19; Steinmetz, Z.20; Stratonovitch, P.19; Supit, I.21; Tao, F.3; Trnka, M.12,13; de Wit, A.21; Roetter, R. P.22,23
发表日期2019
ISSN0168-1923
EISSN1873-2240
卷号264页码:351-362
英文摘要

unless local adaptation can ameliorate these impacts. Ensembles of crop simulation models can be useful tools for assessing if proposed adaptation options are capable of achieving target yields, whilst also quantifying the share of uncertainty in the simulated crop impact resulting from the crop models themselves. Although some studies have analysed the influence of ensemble size on model outcomes, the effect of ensemble composition has not yet been properly appraised. Moreover, results and derived recommendations typically rely on averaged ensemble simulation results without accounting sufficiently for the spread of model outcomes. Therefore, we developed an Ensemble Outcome Agreement (EOA) index, which analyses the effect of changes in composition and size of a multi-model ensemble (MME) to evaluate the level of agreement between MME outcomes with respect to a given hypothesis (e.g. that adaptation measures result in positive crop responses). We analysed the recommendations of a previous study performed with an ensemble of 17 crop models and testing 54 adaptation options for rainfed winter wheat (Triticum aestivwn L.) at Lleida (NE Spain) under perturbed conditions of temperature, precipitation and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Our results confirmed that most adaptations recommended in the previous study have a positive effect. However, we also showed that some options did not remain recommendable in specific conditions if different ensembles were considered. Using EOA, we were able to identify the adaptation options for which there is high confidence in their effectiveness at enhancing yields, even under severe climate perturbations. These include substituting spring wheat for winter wheat combined with earlier sowing dates and standard or longer duration cultivars, or introducing supplementary irrigation, the latter increasing EOA values in all cases. There is low confidence in recovering yields to baseline levels, although this target could be attained for some adaptation options under moderate climate perturbations. Recommendations derived from such robust results may provide crucial information for stakeholders seeking to implement adaptation measures.


WOS研究方向Agriculture ; Forestry ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
来源期刊AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/92111
作者单位1.Univ Politecn Madrid, CEIGRAM, E-28040 Madrid, Spain;
2.Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Econ Anal & Finances, Toledo 45071, Spain;
3.Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki 00790, Finland;
4.Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Helsinki 00251, Finland;
5.IFAPA Junta Andalucia, Cordoba 14004, Spain;
6.Univ Florence, I-50144 Florence, Italy;
7.Polish Acad Sci, Inst Agrophys, Doswiadczaina 4, PL-20290 Lublin, Poland;
8.INRA, UMR EMMAH 1114, F-84914 Avignon, France;
9.James Hutton Inst, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland;
10.ULgGembloux Agrobio Tech, Crop Sci Unii, Dept AgroBioChem& Terra, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium;
11.Univ Bonn, INRES, D-53115 Bonn, Germany;
12.Mendel Univ Brno, Inst Agrosyst & Bioclimatol, Brno 61300, Czech Republic;
13.Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Brno 60300, Czech Republic;
14.Lelbniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany;
15.Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Crop Prod Ecol, Ulls Vag 16, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden;
16.Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, S-22362 Lund, Sweden;
17.Univ Liege, Arlon Campus Environm, B-6700 Arlon, Belgium;
18.Univ Copenhagen, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark;
19.Rothamsted Res, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England;
20.RIFCON GmbH, D-69493 Hirschberg, Germany;
21.Wageningen Univ, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands;
22.Georg August Univ Gottingen, Dept Crop Sci, TROPAGS, Grisebachstr 6, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany;
23.Georg August Univ Gottingen, Ctr Biodivers & Land Use CBL, Busgenweg 1, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Rodriguez, A.,Ruiz-Ramos, M.,Palosuo, T.,et al. Implications of crop model ensemble size and composition for estimates of adaptation effects and agreement of recommendations[J],2019,264:351-362.
APA Rodriguez, A..,Ruiz-Ramos, M..,Palosuo, T..,Carter, T. R..,Fronzek, S..,...&Roetter, R. P..(2019).Implications of crop model ensemble size and composition for estimates of adaptation effects and agreement of recommendations.AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY,264,351-362.
MLA Rodriguez, A.,et al."Implications of crop model ensemble size and composition for estimates of adaptation effects and agreement of recommendations".AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY 264(2019):351-362.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Rodriguez, A.]的文章
[Ruiz-Ramos, M.]的文章
[Palosuo, T.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Rodriguez, A.]的文章
[Ruiz-Ramos, M.]的文章
[Palosuo, T.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Rodriguez, A.]的文章
[Ruiz-Ramos, M.]的文章
[Palosuo, T.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。