CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.001
Using conjoint analysis to gain deeper insights into aesthetic landscape preferences
Schirpke, Uta1,2; Tappeiner, Gottfried3; Tasser, Erich2; Tappeiner, Ulrike1,2
发表日期2019
ISSN1470-160X
EISSN1872-7034
卷号96页码:202-212
英文摘要

Enjoyable landscapes are important resources for recreational activities and the socio-economic development of tourism destinations. A profound understanding of landscape preferences can support landscape management and planning. Despite the increasing integration of the socio-cultural perspective in landscape preferences research, little is known about the links between landscape characteristics and individual landscape preferences. In this study, we aimed to estimate landscape preferences at the individual level based on a set of landscape indicators, allowing us to measure the preferences of each person. We thereby evaluated the suitability of conjoint analysis to identify the relative importance of selected landscape indicators and the corresponding part worth utilities of their characteristics. We further examined whether the preferences are homogeneous or if we can identify groups with largely different preferences. We related the picture ratings from a photo-based survey of landscapes in the Central Alps to a set of 11 landscape indicators, measuring the landscape pattern and features of each picture. Each indicator was divided into two or three levels and used to calculate importance scores and part-worth utilities by hierarchical Bayes analysis for individuals. In our study area, 11 indicators were sufficient to predict the individual choice between two landscapes for similar to 90% of the respondents. Our results indicate non-linear relationships between some landscape indicators and landscape preferences and revealed considerable heterogeneity for the vectors of part-worth utilities, suggesting some methodological problems when applying aggregated linear prediction models. Our findings may therefore enhance predictive models and support landscape planning and management, but further research is necessary to understand the driving forces behind the observed differences.


WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/91166
作者单位1.Univ Innsbruck, Dept Ecol, Sternwartestr 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
2.Eurac Res, Inst Alpine Environm, Viale Druso 1, I-39100 Bozen Bolzano, Italy;
3.Univ Innsbruck, Dept Econ, Univ Str 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Schirpke, Uta,Tappeiner, Gottfried,Tasser, Erich,et al. Using conjoint analysis to gain deeper insights into aesthetic landscape preferences[J],2019,96:202-212.
APA Schirpke, Uta,Tappeiner, Gottfried,Tasser, Erich,&Tappeiner, Ulrike.(2019).Using conjoint analysis to gain deeper insights into aesthetic landscape preferences.ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS,96,202-212.
MLA Schirpke, Uta,et al."Using conjoint analysis to gain deeper insights into aesthetic landscape preferences".ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS 96(2019):202-212.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Schirpke, Uta]的文章
[Tappeiner, Gottfried]的文章
[Tasser, Erich]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Schirpke, Uta]的文章
[Tappeiner, Gottfried]的文章
[Tasser, Erich]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Schirpke, Uta]的文章
[Tappeiner, Gottfried]的文章
[Tasser, Erich]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。