Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1038/s41559-018-0743-8 |
Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs | |
Strassburg, Bernardo B. N.1,2,3; Beyer, Hawthorne L.4; Crouzeilles, Renato1,2,3; Iribarrem, Alvaro1,2; Barros, Felipe2; de Siqueira, Marinez Ferreira5; Sanchez-Tapia, Andrea5; Balmford, Andrew6; Barreto Sansevero, Jeronimo Boelsums7; Santin Brancalion, Pedro Henrique8; Broadbent, Eben North9; Chazdon, Robin L.2,10,11; Oliveira Filho, Ary12; Gardner, Tobya2,13; Gordon, Ascelin14; Latawiec, Agnieszka1,2,15,16; Loyola, Rafael17; Metzger, Jean Paul18; Mills, Morena19; Possingham, Hugh P.20,21; Rodrigues, Ricardo Ribeiro22; de Mattos Scaramuzza, Carlos Alberto23; Scarano, Fabio Rubio3,24; Tambosi, Leandro25; Uriarte, Maria26 | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 2397-334X |
卷号 | 3期号:1页码:62-70 |
英文摘要 | International commitments for ecosystem restoration add up to one-quarter of the world's arable land. Fulfilling them would ease global challenges such as climate change and biodiversity decline but could displace food production and impose financial costs on farmers. Here, we present a restoration prioritization approach capable of revealing these synergies and trade-offs, incorporating ecological and economic efficiencies of scale and modelling specific policy options. Using an actual large-scale restoration target of the Atlantic Forest hotspot, we show that our approach can deliver an eightfold increase in cost-effectiveness for biodiversity conservation compared with a baseline of non-systematic restoration. A compromise solution avoids 26% of the biome's current extinction debt of 2,864 plant and animal species (an increase of 257% compared with the baseline). Moreover, this solution sequesters 1billion tonnes of CO2-equivalent (a 105% increase) while reducing costs by US$28 billion (a 57% decrease). Seizing similar opportunities elsewhere would offer substantial contributions to some of the greatest challenges for humankind. |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Evolutionary Biology |
来源期刊 | NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/90541 |
作者单位 | 1.Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro, Rio Conservat & Sustainabil Sci Ctr, Dept Geog & Environm, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2.Int Inst Sustainabil, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil; 3.Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Ecol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil; 4.Univ Queensland, Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia; 5.Bot Garden Res Inst Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil; 6.Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge, England; 7.Univ Fed Rural Rio de Janeiro, Inst Florestas, Dept Environm Sci, Seropedica, Brazil; 8.Esalq USP, Dept Ciencias Florestais, Piracicaba, Brazil; 9.Univ Florida, Sch Forest Resources & Conservat, Spatial Ecol & Conservat Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA; 10.Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Storrs, CT USA; 11.World Resources Inst, Global Restorat Initiat, Washington, DC 20006 USA; 12.Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Bot, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; 13.Stockholm Environm Inst, Stockholm, Sweden; 14.RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Victoria, Australia; 15.Agr Univ Krakow, Fac Prod & Power Engn, Inst Agr Engn & Informat, Krakow, Poland; 16.Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England; 17.Univ Fed Goias, Dept Ecol, Lab Biogeog Conservacao, Goiania, Go, Brazil; 18.Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biosci, Dept Ecol, Sao Paulo, Brazil; 19.Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, Ascot, Berks, England; 20.Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA USA; 21.Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia; 22.Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Biol Sci, Escola Super Agr Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, Brazil; 23.Brazilian Minist Environm MMA, Dept Ecosyst Conservat, Brasilia, DF, Brazil; 24.Brazilian Fdn Sustainable Dev, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil; 25.Fed Univ ABC, Ctr Engn Modelagem & Ciencias Sociais Aplicadas, Santo Andre, Brazil; 26.Columbia Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Environm Biol, New York, NY USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Strassburg, Bernardo B. N.,Beyer, Hawthorne L.,Crouzeilles, Renato,et al. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs[J],2019,3(1):62-70. |
APA | Strassburg, Bernardo B. N..,Beyer, Hawthorne L..,Crouzeilles, Renato.,Iribarrem, Alvaro.,Barros, Felipe.,...&Uriarte, Maria.(2019).Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs.NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION,3(1),62-70. |
MLA | Strassburg, Bernardo B. N.,et al."Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs".NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION 3.1(2019):62-70. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。