CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s11229-017-1481-1
Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science
Oreskes, Naomi
发表日期2019-03-01
ISSN0039-7857
EISSN1573-0964
卷号196期号:3页码:881-905
英文摘要Paul Hoyningen-Huene argues that what makes scientific knowledge special is its systematic character, and that this can be used to solve the demarcation problem. He labels this STDC: Systematicity Theory's Demarcation Criterion. This paper argues that
关键词SystematicityDemarcationSTDCHomeopathyFacsimile scienceClimate change denialCreationismIntelligent design
学科领域History & Philosophy Of Science;Philosophy
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000461358900007
来源期刊SYNTHESE
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/80600
作者单位Harvard Univ, Dept Hist Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Oreskes, Naomi. Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science[J],2019,196(3):881-905.
APA Oreskes, Naomi.(2019).Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science.SYNTHESE,196(3),881-905.
MLA Oreskes, Naomi."Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science".SYNTHESE 196.3(2019):881-905.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Oreskes, Naomi]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Oreskes, Naomi]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Oreskes, Naomi]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。