Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s11229-017-1481-1 |
Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science | |
Oreskes, Naomi | |
发表日期 | 2019-03-01 |
ISSN | 0039-7857 |
EISSN | 1573-0964 |
卷号 | 196期号:3页码:881-905 |
英文摘要 | Paul Hoyningen-Huene argues that what makes scientific knowledge special is its systematic character, and that this can be used to solve the demarcation problem. He labels this STDC: Systematicity Theory's Demarcation Criterion. This paper argues that |
关键词 | SystematicityDemarcationSTDCHomeopathyFacsimile scienceClimate change denialCreationismIntelligent design |
学科领域 | History & Philosophy Of Science;Philosophy |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000461358900007 |
来源期刊 | SYNTHESE |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/80600 |
作者单位 | Harvard Univ, Dept Hist Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Oreskes, Naomi. Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science[J],2019,196(3):881-905. |
APA | Oreskes, Naomi.(2019).Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science.SYNTHESE,196(3),881-905. |
MLA | Oreskes, Naomi."Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science".SYNTHESE 196.3(2019):881-905. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Oreskes, Naomi]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Oreskes, Naomi]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Oreskes, Naomi]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。