气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Comparison of Enterococcus quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis results from Midwest US river samples using EPA Method 1611 and Method 1609 PCR reagents

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.mimet.2014.03.004
	Comparison of Enterococcus quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis results from Midwest US river samples using EPA Method 1611 and Method 1609 PCR reagents
	Sivaganensan, Mano 1; Siefring, Shawn 2; Varma, Manju 2; Haugland, Richard A.2
发表日期	2014-06-01
ISSN	0167-7012
卷号	101 页码:9-17
英文摘要	Enterococci target sequence density estimates from analyses of diluted river water DNA extracts by EPA Methods 1611 and 1609 and estimates with lower detection limits from undiluted DNA extracts by Method 1609 were in-distinguishable. These methods should be equally suitable for comparison with U.S. EPA 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria values. Published by Elsevier B.V.
英文关键词	Enterococcus;qPCR;Recreational water quality;EPA Method 1611;EPA Method 1609
语种	英语
WOS记录号	WOS:000337659300002
来源期刊	JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
来源机构	美国环保署
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/62507
作者单位	1.US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA; 2.US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Sivaganensan, Mano,Siefring, Shawn,Varma, Manju,et al. Comparison of Enterococcus quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis results from Midwest US river samples using EPA Method 1611 and Method 1609 PCR reagents[J]. 美国环保署,2014,101:9-17.
APA	Sivaganensan, Mano,Siefring, Shawn,Varma, Manju,&Haugland, Richard A..(2014).Comparison of Enterococcus quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis results from Midwest US river samples using EPA Method 1611 and Method 1609 PCR reagents.JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS,101,9-17.
MLA	Sivaganensan, Mano,et al."Comparison of Enterococcus quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis results from Midwest US river samples using EPA Method 1611 and Method 1609 PCR reagents".JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS 101(2014):9-17.