Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13028 |
Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish | |
Leal, Cecilia G.1,2,3; Barlow, Jos1,2; Gardner, Toby A.4; Hughes, Robert M.5,6; Leitao, Rafael P.7,8; Mac Nally, Ralph9,10; Kaufmann, Philip R.11; Ferraz, Silvio F. B.12; Zuanon, Jansen7; de Paula, Felipe R.12; Ferreira, Joice13; Thomson, James R.14; Lennox, Gareth D.1,2; Dary, Eurizangela P.15; Ropke, Cristhiana P.16,17; Pompeu, Paulo S.3 | |
发表日期 | 2018-05-01 |
ISSN | 0021-8901 |
卷号 | 55期号:3页码:1312-1326 |
英文摘要 | 1. Agricultural expansion and intensification are major threats to tropical biodiversity. In addition to the direct removal of native vegetation, agricultural expansion often elicits other human-induced disturbances, many of which are poorly addressed by existing environmental legislation and conservation programmes. This is particularly true for tropical freshwater systems, where there is considerable uncertainty about whether a legislative focus on protecting riparian vegetation is sufficient to conserve stream fauna. 2. To assess the extent to which stream fish are being effectively conserved in agricultural landscapes, we examined the spatial distribution of assemblages in river basins to identify the relative importance of human impacts at instream, riparian and catchment scales, in shaping observed patterns. We used an extensive dataset on the ecological condition of 83 low-order streams distributed in three river basins in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. 3. We collected and identified 24,420 individual fish from 134 species. Multiplicative diversity partitioning revealed high levels of compositional dissimilarity (DS) among stream sites (DS = 0.74 to 0.83) and river basins (DS = 0.82), due mainly to turnover (77.8% to 81.8%) rather than nestedness. The highly heterogeneous fish faunas in small Amazonian streams underscore the vital importance of enacting measures to protect forests on private lands outside of public protected areas. 4. Instream habitat features explained more variability in fish assemblages (15%-19%) than riparian (2%-12%), catchment (4%-13%) or natural covariates (4%-11%). Although grouping species into functional guilds allowed us to explain up to 31% of their abundance (i.e. for nektonic herbivores), individual riparian - and catchment- scale predictor variables that are commonly a focus of environmental legislation explained very little of the observed variation (partial R-2 values mostly <5%). 5. Policy implications. Current rates of agricultural intensification and mechanization in tropical landscapes are unprecedented, yet the existing legislative frameworks focusing on protecting riparian vegetation seem insufficient to conserve stream environments and their fish assemblages. To safeguard the species-rich freshwater biota of small Amazonian streams, conservation actions must shift towards managing whole basins and drainage networks, as well as agricultural practices in already-cleared land. |
英文关键词 | Amazon;Brazilian Forest Code;functional guilds;human-modified landscapes;multiplicative diversity partitioning;physical habitat;species turnover;tropical landscapes;watershed management |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000430059500026 |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61931 |
作者单位 | 1.Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, Para, Brazil; 2.Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster, England; 3.Univ Fed Lavras, Fish Ecol Lab, Lavras, MG, Brazil; 4.Stockholm Environm Inst, Stockholm, Sweden; 5.Oregon State Univ, Amnis Opes Inst, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; 6.Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; 7.Natl Inst Amazonia Res, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; 8.Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Gen Biol, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; 9.Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Bruce, ACT, Australia; 10.La Trobe Univ, Dept Ecol Environm & Evolut, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; 11.US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Corvallis, OR USA; 12.Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Forest Hydrol Lab LHF, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; 13.Embrapa Amazonia Oriental, Belem, Para, Brazil; 14.Arthur Rylah Inst Environm Res, Dept Environm Land Water & Planning, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia; 15.Univ Fed Mato Grosso, Inst Nat Human & Social Sci, Sinop, MT, Brazil; 16.Univ Fed Amazonas, Fac Agrarian Sci, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; 17.Univ Fed Amazonas, Inst Biol, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Leal, Cecilia G.,Barlow, Jos,Gardner, Toby A.,et al. Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish[J]. 美国环保署,2018,55(3):1312-1326. |
APA | Leal, Cecilia G..,Barlow, Jos.,Gardner, Toby A..,Hughes, Robert M..,Leitao, Rafael P..,...&Pompeu, Paulo S..(2018).Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish.JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY,55(3),1312-1326. |
MLA | Leal, Cecilia G.,et al."Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish".JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY 55.3(2018):1312-1326. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。