CCPortal
DOI10.1111/1365-2664.13028
Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish
Leal, Cecilia G.1,2,3; Barlow, Jos1,2; Gardner, Toby A.4; Hughes, Robert M.5,6; Leitao, Rafael P.7,8; Mac Nally, Ralph9,10; Kaufmann, Philip R.11; Ferraz, Silvio F. B.12; Zuanon, Jansen7; de Paula, Felipe R.12; Ferreira, Joice13; Thomson, James R.14; Lennox, Gareth D.1,2; Dary, Eurizangela P.15; Ropke, Cristhiana P.16,17; Pompeu, Paulo S.3
发表日期2018-05-01
ISSN0021-8901
卷号55期号:3页码:1312-1326
英文摘要

1. Agricultural expansion and intensification are major threats to tropical biodiversity. In addition to the direct removal of native vegetation, agricultural expansion often elicits other human-induced disturbances, many of which are poorly addressed by existing environmental legislation and conservation programmes. This is particularly true for tropical freshwater systems, where there is considerable uncertainty about whether a legislative focus on protecting riparian vegetation is sufficient to conserve stream fauna.


2. To assess the extent to which stream fish are being effectively conserved in agricultural landscapes, we examined the spatial distribution of assemblages in river basins to identify the relative importance of human impacts at instream, riparian and catchment scales, in shaping observed patterns. We used an extensive dataset on the ecological condition of 83 low-order streams distributed in three river basins in the eastern Brazilian Amazon.


3. We collected and identified 24,420 individual fish from 134 species. Multiplicative diversity partitioning revealed high levels of compositional dissimilarity (DS) among stream sites (DS = 0.74 to 0.83) and river basins (DS = 0.82), due mainly to turnover (77.8% to 81.8%) rather than nestedness. The highly heterogeneous fish faunas in small Amazonian streams underscore the vital importance of enacting measures to protect forests on private lands outside of public protected areas.


4. Instream habitat features explained more variability in fish assemblages (15%-19%) than riparian (2%-12%), catchment (4%-13%) or natural covariates (4%-11%). Although grouping species into functional guilds allowed us to explain up to 31% of their abundance (i.e. for nektonic herbivores), individual riparian - and catchment- scale predictor variables that are commonly a focus of environmental legislation explained very little of the observed variation (partial R-2 values mostly <5%).


5. Policy implications. Current rates of agricultural intensification and mechanization in tropical landscapes are unprecedented, yet the existing legislative frameworks focusing on protecting riparian vegetation seem insufficient to conserve stream environments and their fish assemblages. To safeguard the species-rich freshwater biota of small Amazonian streams, conservation actions must shift towards managing whole basins and drainage networks, as well as agricultural practices in already-cleared land.


英文关键词Amazon;Brazilian Forest Code;functional guilds;human-modified landscapes;multiplicative diversity partitioning;physical habitat;species turnover;tropical landscapes;watershed management
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000430059500026
来源期刊JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61931
作者单位1.Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, Para, Brazil;
2.Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster, England;
3.Univ Fed Lavras, Fish Ecol Lab, Lavras, MG, Brazil;
4.Stockholm Environm Inst, Stockholm, Sweden;
5.Oregon State Univ, Amnis Opes Inst, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA;
6.Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA;
7.Natl Inst Amazonia Res, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil;
8.Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Gen Biol, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil;
9.Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Bruce, ACT, Australia;
10.La Trobe Univ, Dept Ecol Environm & Evolut, Melbourne, Vic, Australia;
11.US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Corvallis, OR USA;
12.Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Forest Hydrol Lab LHF, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil;
13.Embrapa Amazonia Oriental, Belem, Para, Brazil;
14.Arthur Rylah Inst Environm Res, Dept Environm Land Water & Planning, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia;
15.Univ Fed Mato Grosso, Inst Nat Human & Social Sci, Sinop, MT, Brazil;
16.Univ Fed Amazonas, Fac Agrarian Sci, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil;
17.Univ Fed Amazonas, Inst Biol, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Leal, Cecilia G.,Barlow, Jos,Gardner, Toby A.,et al. Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish[J]. 美国环保署,2018,55(3):1312-1326.
APA Leal, Cecilia G..,Barlow, Jos.,Gardner, Toby A..,Hughes, Robert M..,Leitao, Rafael P..,...&Pompeu, Paulo S..(2018).Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish.JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY,55(3),1312-1326.
MLA Leal, Cecilia G.,et al."Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish".JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY 55.3(2018):1312-1326.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Leal, Cecilia G.]的文章
[Barlow, Jos]的文章
[Gardner, Toby A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Leal, Cecilia G.]的文章
[Barlow, Jos]的文章
[Gardner, Toby A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Leal, Cecilia G.]的文章
[Barlow, Jos]的文章
[Gardner, Toby A.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。