CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.060
Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a suite of qPCR-based microbial source tracking methods
Ebentier, Darcy L.1; Hanley, Kaitlyn T.1,2; Cao, Yiping3; Badgley, Brian D.4,5; Boehm, Alexandria B.6; Ervin, Jared S.7,8; Goodwin, Kelly D.9; Gourmelon, Michele10; Griffith, John F.3; Holden, Patricia A.7,8; Kelty, Catherine A.11; Lozach, Solen10; McGee, Charles12; Peed, Lindsay A.11; Raith, Meredith3; Ryu, Hodon11; Sadowsky, Michael J.4,5; Scott, Elizabeth A.3; Domingo, Jorge Santo11; Schriewer, Alexander2; Sinigalliano, Christopher D.9; Shanks, Orin C.11; Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C.7,8; Wang, Dan6; Wuertz, Stefan2,13,14; Jay, Jennifer A.1
发表日期2013-11-15
ISSN0043-1354
卷号47期号:18页码:6839-6848
英文摘要

Many PCR-based methods for microbial source tracking (MST) have been developed and validated within individual research laboratories. Inter-laboratory validation of these methods, however, has been minimal, and the effects of protocol standardization regimes have not been thoroughly evaluated. Knowledge of factors influencing PCR in different laboratories is vital to future technology transfer for use of MST methods as a tool for water quality management. In this study, a blinded set of 64 filters (containing 32 duplicate samples generated from 12 composite fecal sources) were analyzed by three to five core laboratories with a suite of PCR-based methods utilizing standardized reagents and protocols. Repeatability (intra-laboratory variability) and reproducibility (inter-laboratory variability) of observed results were assessed. When standardized methodologies were used, intra- and inter-laboratory %CVs were generally low (median %CV 0.1-3.3% and 1.9-7.1%, respectively) and comparable to those observed in similar inter-laboratory validation studies performed on other methods of quantifying fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in environmental samples. ANOVA of %CV values found three human-associated methods (BsteriF1, BacHum, and HF183Taqman) to be similarly reproducible ( p > 0.05) and significantly more reproducible (p < 0.05) than HumM2. This was attributed to the increased variability associated with low target concentrations detected by HumM2 (approximately 1-2 log(20)copies/filter lower) compared to other human-associated methods. Cow-associated methods (BacCow and CowM2) were similarly reproducible ( p > 0.05). When using standardized protocols, variance component analysis indicated sample type (fecal source and concentration) to be the major contributor to total variability with that from replicate filters and inter-laboratory analysis to be within the same order of magnitude but larger than inherent intra-laboratory variability. However, when reagents and protocols were not standardized, inter-laboratory %CV generally increased with a corresponding decline in reproducibility. Overall, these findings verify the repeatability and reproducibility of these MST methods and highlight the need for standardization of protocols and consumables prior to implementation of larger scale MST studies involving multiple laboratories. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


英文关键词Microbial source tracking;qPCR;Repeatability;Reproducibility;Fecal pollution
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000328444000004
来源期刊WATER RESEARCH
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61842
作者单位1.Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA;
2.Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA;
3.Southern Calif Coastal Water Res Project Author, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 USA;
4.Univ Minnesota, Inst Biotechnol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA;
5.Univ Minnesota, Dept Soil Water & Climate, St Paul, MN 55108 USA;
6.Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA;
7.Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA;
8.Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Earth Res Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA;
9.NOAA, Atlantic Oceanog & Meteorol Lab, Miami, FL 33149 USA;
10.IFREMER, ZI Pointe Diable, Unite Environm Microbiol & Phycotoxines, Dept Ressources Biol & Environm,MIC LNR,Lab Micro, Plouzane, France;
11.US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA;
12.Orange Cty Sanitat Dist, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 USA;
13.Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Singapore Ctr Environm Life Sci Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore;
14.Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ebentier, Darcy L.,Hanley, Kaitlyn T.,Cao, Yiping,et al. Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a suite of qPCR-based microbial source tracking methods[J]. 美国环保署,2013,47(18):6839-6848.
APA Ebentier, Darcy L..,Hanley, Kaitlyn T..,Cao, Yiping.,Badgley, Brian D..,Boehm, Alexandria B..,...&Jay, Jennifer A..(2013).Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a suite of qPCR-based microbial source tracking methods.WATER RESEARCH,47(18),6839-6848.
MLA Ebentier, Darcy L.,et al."Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a suite of qPCR-based microbial source tracking methods".WATER RESEARCH 47.18(2013):6839-6848.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ebentier, Darcy L.]的文章
[Hanley, Kaitlyn T.]的文章
[Cao, Yiping]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ebentier, Darcy L.]的文章
[Hanley, Kaitlyn T.]的文章
[Cao, Yiping]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ebentier, Darcy L.]的文章
[Hanley, Kaitlyn T.]的文章
[Cao, Yiping]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。