CCPortal
DOI10.3109/10408444.2015.1082973
Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water
Wolf, Douglas C.1; Bachman, Ammie2; Barrett, Gordon3; Bellin, Cheryl4; Goodman, Jay I.5; Jensen, Elke6; Moretto, Angelo6; McMullin, Tami7; Pastoor, Timothy P.1; Schoeny, Rita8; Slezak, Brian4; Wend, Korinna9,10,11; Embry, Michelle R.12
发表日期2016-01-02
ISSN1040-8444
卷号46期号:1页码:43-53
英文摘要

The HESI-led RISK21 effort has developed a framework supporting the use of twenty-first century technology in obtaining and using information for chemical risk assessment. This framework represents a problem formulation-based, exposure-driven, tiered data acquisition approach that leads to an informed decision on human health safety to be made when sufficient evidence is available. It provides a transparent and consistent approach to evaluate information in order to maximize the ability of assessments to inform decisions and to optimize the use of resources. To demonstrate the application of the framework's roadmap and matrix, this case study evaluates a large number of chemicals that could be present in drinking water. The focus is to prioritize which of these should be considered for human health risk as individual contaminants. The example evaluates 20 potential drinking water contaminants, using the tiered RISK21 approach in combination with graphical representation of information at each step, using the RISK21 matrix. Utilizing the framework, 11 of the 20 chemicals were assigned low priority based on available exposure data alone, which demonstrated that exposure was extremely low. The remaining nine chemicals were further evaluated, using refined estimates of toxicity based on readily available data, with three deemed high priority for further evaluation. In the present case study, it was determined that the greatest value of additional information would be from improved exposure models and not from additional hazard characterization.


英文关键词Drinking water;integrated evaluation strategy;prioritization;risk assessment;RISK21;tiered approach
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000366837100002
来源期刊CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61834
作者单位1.Syngenta Crop Protect LLC, Greensboro, NC USA;
2.ExxonMobil Biomed Sci Inc, Annandale, NJ USA;
3.Hlth Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0L2, Canada;
4.DuPont Haskell Global Centers Hlth & Environm Sci, Newark, DE USA;
5.Michigan State Univ, Pharmcol & Toxicol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA;
6.Univ Milan, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Milan, Italy;
7.Dow Corning Corp, Midland, MI USA;
8.US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA;
9.Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA;
10.Orthoped Hosp, Los Angeles, CA USA;
11.Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Orthopaed Hosp Res Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA;
12.ILSI Hlth & Environm Sci Inst, Washington, DC 20005 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Wolf, Douglas C.,Bachman, Ammie,Barrett, Gordon,et al. Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water[J]. 美国环保署,2016,46(1):43-53.
APA Wolf, Douglas C..,Bachman, Ammie.,Barrett, Gordon.,Bellin, Cheryl.,Goodman, Jay I..,...&Embry, Michelle R..(2016).Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water.CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY,46(1),43-53.
MLA Wolf, Douglas C.,et al."Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water".CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY 46.1(2016):43-53.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Wolf, Douglas C.]的文章
[Bachman, Ammie]的文章
[Barrett, Gordon]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Wolf, Douglas C.]的文章
[Bachman, Ammie]的文章
[Barrett, Gordon]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Wolf, Douglas C.]的文章
[Bachman, Ammie]的文章
[Barrett, Gordon]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。