Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069X-13-2 |
Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies | |
Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi-Anna1; Spiegelman, Donna2,3; Szpiro, Adam A.4; Sheppard, Lianne4,5; Kaufman, Joel D.5; Yanosky, Jeff D.6; Williams, Ronald7; Laden, Francine1,2; Hong, Biling2; Suh, Helen8 | |
发表日期 | 2014-01-13 |
ISSN | 1476-069X |
卷号 | 13 |
英文摘要 | Background: Exposure measurement error is a concern in long-term PM2.5 health studies using ambient concentrations as exposures. We assessed error magnitude by estimating calibration coefficients as the association between personal PM2.5 exposures from validation studies and typically available surrogate exposures. Methods: Daily personal and ambient PM2.5, and when available sulfate, measurements were compiled from nine cities, over 2 to 12 days. True exposure was defined as personal exposure to PM2.5 of ambient origin. Since PM2.5 of ambient origin could only be determined for five cities, personal exposure to total PM2.5 was also considered. Surrogate exposures were estimated as ambient PM2.5 at the nearest monitor or predicted outside subjects' homes. We estimated calibration coefficients by regressing true on surrogate exposures in random effects models. Results: When monthly-averaged personal PM2.5 of ambient origin was used as the true exposure, calibration coefficients equaled 0.31 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.47) for nearest monitor and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.65) for outdoor home predictions. Between-city heterogeneity was not found for outdoor home PM2.5 for either true exposure. Heterogeneity was significant for nearest monitor PM2.5, for both true exposures, but not after adjusting for city-average motor vehicle number for total personal PM2.5. Conclusions: Calibration coefficients were < 1, consistent with previously reported chronic health risks using nearest monitor exposures being under-estimated when ambient concentrations are the exposure of interest. Calibration coefficients were closer to 1 for outdoor home predictions, likely reflecting less spatial error. Further research is needed to determine how our findings can be incorporated in future health studies. |
英文关键词 | Exposure measurement error;Fine particles;Fine particles of ambient origin;Monitoring data;Spatio-temporal models |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000334538200001 |
来源期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61162 |
作者单位 | 1.Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA; 2.Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA; 3.Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA; 4.Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA; 5.Univ Washington, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA; 6.Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Hershey, PA USA; 7.US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA; 8.Northeastern Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi-Anna,Spiegelman, Donna,Szpiro, Adam A.,et al. Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies[J]. 美国环保署,2014,13. |
APA | Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi-Anna.,Spiegelman, Donna.,Szpiro, Adam A..,Sheppard, Lianne.,Kaufman, Joel D..,...&Suh, Helen.(2014).Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies.ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH,13. |
MLA | Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi-Anna,et al."Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies".ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 13(2014). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。