CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.012
Electric sector policy, technological change, and US emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project
Bistline, John E.1; Hodson, Elke2; Rossmann, Charles G.3; Creason, Jared4; Murray, Brian5; Barron, Alexander R.6
发表日期2018-06-01
ISSN0140-9883
卷号73页码:307-325
英文摘要

The Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 32 study compares a range of coordinated scenarios to explore implications of U.S. climate policy options and technological change on the electric power sector. Harmonized policy scenarios (including mass-based emissions limits and various power-sector-only carbon tax trajectories) across 16 models provide comparative assessments of potential impacts on electric sector investment and generation outcomes, emissions reductions, and economic implications. This paper compares results across these policy alternatives, including a variety of technological and natural gas price assumptions, and summarizes robust findings and areas of disagreement across participating models. Under a wide range of policy, technology, and market assumptions, model results suggest that future coal generation will decline relative to current levels while generation from natural gas, wind, and solar will increase, though the pace and extent of these changes vary by policy scenario, technological assumptions, region, and model. Climate policies can amplify trends already under way and make them less susceptible to future market changes. The model results provide useful insights to a range of stakeholders, but future research focused on intersectoral linkages in emission reductions (e.g., the role of electrification), effects of energy storage, and better coverage of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can improve insights even further. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


英文关键词Climate policy;Energy-economic modeling;Model intercomparison;Market-based environmental policy;Technology;Electric sector
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000438000600023
来源期刊ENERGY ECONOMICS
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61139
作者单位1.Elect Power Res Inst, 3420 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA;
2.US DOE, 1000 Independence Ave, Washington, DC 20585 USA;
3.Southern Co, 600 N 18th St, Birmingham, AL 35203 USA;
4.US EPA, 1200 Penn Ave,Mail Code 6207J, Washington, DC 20460 USA;
5.Duke Univ, Energy Initiat & Nicholas Inst Environm Policy So, Box 90335, Durham, NC 27708 USA;
6.Smith Coll, 44 Coll Lane, Northampton, MA 01063 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bistline, John E.,Hodson, Elke,Rossmann, Charles G.,et al. Electric sector policy, technological change, and US emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project[J]. 美国环保署,2018,73:307-325.
APA Bistline, John E.,Hodson, Elke,Rossmann, Charles G.,Creason, Jared,Murray, Brian,&Barron, Alexander R..(2018).Electric sector policy, technological change, and US emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project.ENERGY ECONOMICS,73,307-325.
MLA Bistline, John E.,et al."Electric sector policy, technological change, and US emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project".ENERGY ECONOMICS 73(2018):307-325.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bistline, John E.]的文章
[Hodson, Elke]的文章
[Rossmann, Charles G.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bistline, John E.]的文章
[Hodson, Elke]的文章
[Rossmann, Charles G.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bistline, John E.]的文章
[Hodson, Elke]的文章
[Rossmann, Charles G.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。