CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.015
Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp.
Ryu, Hodon1; Elk, Michael1; Khan, Izhar U. H.2,3; Harwood, Valerie J.4; Molina, Marirosa5; Edge, Thomas A.2; Domingo, Jorge Santo1
发表日期2014
ISSN0043-1354
卷号48页码:613-621
英文摘要

Chicken feces commonly contain human pathogens and are also important sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters. Consequently, methods that can detect chicken fecal pollution are needed in public health and environmental monitoring studies. In this study, we compared a previously developed SYBR green qPCR assay (LA35) to a novel TaqMan qPCR assay (CL) for the environmental detection of poultry-associated fecal pollution. We tested both assays against chicken litter (n = 40), chicken fecal samples (n = 186), non-chicken fecal sources (n = 484), and environmental water samples (n = 323). Most chicken litter samples (i.e., >= 98%) were positive for both assays with relatively high signal intensities, whereas only 23% and 12% of poultry fecal samples (n = 186) were positive with the LA35 and the CL assays, respectively. Data using fecal samples from nontarget animal species showed that the assays are highly host-associated (>= 95%). Bayesian statistical models showed that the two assays are associated with relatively low probability of false-positive and false-negative signals in water samples. The CL marker had a lower prevalence than the LA35 assay when tested against environmental water samples (i.e., 21% vs. 31% positive signals). However, by combining the results from the two assays the detection levels increased to 41%, suggesting that using multiple assays can improve the detection of chicken-fecal pollution in environmental waters. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.


英文关键词Fecal pollution;Microbial source tracking;Poultry-associated assays;qPCR
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000329553100058
来源期刊WATER RESEARCH
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/60970
作者单位1.US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH USA;
2.Environm Canada, Natl Water Res Inst, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6, Canada;
3.Agr & Agri Food Canada, Eastern Cereal & Oilseed Res Ctr ECORC, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada;
4.Univ S Florida, Dept Biol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA;
5.US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Athens, GA USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ryu, Hodon,Elk, Michael,Khan, Izhar U. H.,et al. Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp.[J]. 美国环保署,2014,48:613-621.
APA Ryu, Hodon.,Elk, Michael.,Khan, Izhar U. H..,Harwood, Valerie J..,Molina, Marirosa.,...&Domingo, Jorge Santo.(2014).Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp..WATER RESEARCH,48,613-621.
MLA Ryu, Hodon,et al."Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp.".WATER RESEARCH 48(2014):613-621.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ryu, Hodon]的文章
[Elk, Michael]的文章
[Khan, Izhar U. H.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ryu, Hodon]的文章
[Elk, Michael]的文章
[Khan, Izhar U. H.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ryu, Hodon]的文章
[Elk, Michael]的文章
[Khan, Izhar U. H.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。