Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.015 |
Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp. | |
Ryu, Hodon1; Elk, Michael1; Khan, Izhar U. H.2,3; Harwood, Valerie J.4; Molina, Marirosa5; Edge, Thomas A.2; Domingo, Jorge Santo1 | |
发表日期 | 2014 |
ISSN | 0043-1354 |
卷号 | 48页码:613-621 |
英文摘要 | Chicken feces commonly contain human pathogens and are also important sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters. Consequently, methods that can detect chicken fecal pollution are needed in public health and environmental monitoring studies. In this study, we compared a previously developed SYBR green qPCR assay (LA35) to a novel TaqMan qPCR assay (CL) for the environmental detection of poultry-associated fecal pollution. We tested both assays against chicken litter (n = 40), chicken fecal samples (n = 186), non-chicken fecal sources (n = 484), and environmental water samples (n = 323). Most chicken litter samples (i.e., >= 98%) were positive for both assays with relatively high signal intensities, whereas only 23% and 12% of poultry fecal samples (n = 186) were positive with the LA35 and the CL assays, respectively. Data using fecal samples from nontarget animal species showed that the assays are highly host-associated (>= 95%). Bayesian statistical models showed that the two assays are associated with relatively low probability of false-positive and false-negative signals in water samples. The CL marker had a lower prevalence than the LA35 assay when tested against environmental water samples (i.e., 21% vs. 31% positive signals). However, by combining the results from the two assays the detection levels increased to 41%, suggesting that using multiple assays can improve the detection of chicken-fecal pollution in environmental waters. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
英文关键词 | Fecal pollution;Microbial source tracking;Poultry-associated assays;qPCR |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000329553100058 |
来源期刊 | WATER RESEARCH
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/60970 |
作者单位 | 1.US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH USA; 2.Environm Canada, Natl Water Res Inst, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6, Canada; 3.Agr & Agri Food Canada, Eastern Cereal & Oilseed Res Ctr ECORC, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada; 4.Univ S Florida, Dept Biol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA; 5.US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Athens, GA USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ryu, Hodon,Elk, Michael,Khan, Izhar U. H.,et al. Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp.[J]. 美国环保署,2014,48:613-621. |
APA | Ryu, Hodon.,Elk, Michael.,Khan, Izhar U. H..,Harwood, Valerie J..,Molina, Marirosa.,...&Domingo, Jorge Santo.(2014).Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp..WATER RESEARCH,48,613-621. |
MLA | Ryu, Hodon,et al."Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp.".WATER RESEARCH 48(2014):613-621. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。