CCPortal
DOI10.1177/1525822X12453516
Comparing Random Sample Q and R Methods for Understanding Natural Resource Attitudes
Thompson, Aaron W.1; Dumyahn, Sarah2; Prokopy, Linda S.2; Amberg, Shannon3; Baumgart-Getz, Adam4; Jackson-Tyree, JoElla2; Perry-Hill, Rebecca2; Reimer, Adam2; Robinson, Kimberly2; Mase, Amber Saylor2
发表日期2013-02-01
ISSN1525-822X
卷号25期号:1页码:25-46
英文摘要

This study collects data on community views of the Wabash River in north-central Indiana using 36 representative statements. The statements were incorporated into two different formats: (1) a standard survey, or Likert-type, instrument and (2) a Q-methodology instrument for mailed distribution to two separate random samples of community residents, which allowed for comparing the results of these methodologies. The data were analyzed using factor analysis techniques. The analysis revealed that under identical sampling conditions, the results of Q and R methodologies are similar. Additional discussion focuses on the similarities and differences of these results and how Q methodology can contribute to our understanding of community attitudes toward natural resources.


英文关键词Q methodology;survey methodology;factor analysis;consensus analysis;natural resources
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000313655200002
来源期刊FIELD METHODS
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/60466
作者单位1.Univ Wisconsin, Coll Nat Resources, Stevens Point, WI 54481 USA;
2.Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA;
3.St Marys Univ Minnesota, Prairie Isl Field Stn, Winona, MN USA;
4.US EPA, Community & Tribal Programs Grp, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Thompson, Aaron W.,Dumyahn, Sarah,Prokopy, Linda S.,et al. Comparing Random Sample Q and R Methods for Understanding Natural Resource Attitudes[J]. 美国环保署,2013,25(1):25-46.
APA Thompson, Aaron W..,Dumyahn, Sarah.,Prokopy, Linda S..,Amberg, Shannon.,Baumgart-Getz, Adam.,...&Mase, Amber Saylor.(2013).Comparing Random Sample Q and R Methods for Understanding Natural Resource Attitudes.FIELD METHODS,25(1),25-46.
MLA Thompson, Aaron W.,et al."Comparing Random Sample Q and R Methods for Understanding Natural Resource Attitudes".FIELD METHODS 25.1(2013):25-46.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Thompson, Aaron W.]的文章
[Dumyahn, Sarah]的文章
[Prokopy, Linda S.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Thompson, Aaron W.]的文章
[Dumyahn, Sarah]的文章
[Prokopy, Linda S.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Thompson, Aaron W.]的文章
[Dumyahn, Sarah]的文章
[Prokopy, Linda S.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。