Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1002/etc.2299 |
Effects-directed analysis (EDA) and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE): Complementary but different approaches for diagnosing causes of environmental toxicity | |
Burgess, Robert M.1; Ho, Kay T.1; Brack, Werner2; Lamoree, Marja3 | |
发表日期 | 2013-09-01 |
ISSN | 0730-7268 |
卷号 | 32期号:9页码:1935-1945 |
英文摘要 | Currently, 2 approaches are available for performing environmental diagnostics on samples like municipal and industrial effluents, interstitial waters, and whole sediments to identify anthropogenic contaminants causing toxicological effects. One approach is toxicity identification evaluation (TIE), which was developed primarily in North America to determine active toxicants to whole-organism endpoints. The second approach is effects-directed analysis (EDA), which has origins in both Europe and North America. Unlike TIE, EDA uses primarily in vitro endpoints with an emphasis on organic contaminants as the cause of observed toxicity. The 2 approaches have fundamental differences that make them distinct techniques. In EDA, the sophisticated and elegant fractionation and chemical analyses performed to identify the causes of toxicity with a high degree of specificity often compromise contaminant bioavailability. In contrast, in TIE, toxicant bioavailability is maintained and is considered critical to accurately identifying the causes of environmental toxicity. However, maintaining contaminant bioavailability comes with the cost of limiting, at least until recently, the use of the types of sophisticated fractionation and elegant chemical analyses that have resulted in the high specificity of toxicant diagnosis performed in EDA. The present study provides an overview of each approach and highlights areas where the 2 approaches can complement one another and lead to the improvement of both. (C) 2013 SETAC |
英文关键词 | Effects-directed analysis;Environmental diagnosis;Fractionation;Bioavailability;Bioaccessibility |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000322253800003 |
来源期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/59944 |
作者单位 | 1.US EPA, Atlantic Ecol Div, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Narragansett, RI USA; 2.UFZ Helmholt Ctr Environm Res, Dept Effects Directed Anal, Leipzig, Germany; 3.Free Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Fac Earth & Life Sci, NL-1007 MC Amsterdam, Netherlands |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Burgess, Robert M.,Ho, Kay T.,Brack, Werner,et al. Effects-directed analysis (EDA) and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE): Complementary but different approaches for diagnosing causes of environmental toxicity[J]. 美国环保署,2013,32(9):1935-1945. |
APA | Burgess, Robert M.,Ho, Kay T.,Brack, Werner,&Lamoree, Marja.(2013).Effects-directed analysis (EDA) and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE): Complementary but different approaches for diagnosing causes of environmental toxicity.ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY,32(9),1935-1945. |
MLA | Burgess, Robert M.,et al."Effects-directed analysis (EDA) and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE): Complementary but different approaches for diagnosing causes of environmental toxicity".ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 32.9(2013):1935-1945. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。