Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1002/hyp.10860 |
Evaluating weather observations and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as inputs for hydrologic modelling in the tropics | |
Auerbach, Daniel A.1,4; Easton, Zachary M.2; Walter, M. Todd3; Flecker, Alexander S.1; Fuka, Daniel R.2 | |
发表日期 | 2016-09-15 |
ISSN | 0885-6087 |
卷号 | 30期号:19页码:3466-3477 |
英文摘要 | Correctly representing weather is critical to hydrological modelling, but scarce or poor quality observations can often compromise model accuracy. Reanalysis datasets may help to address this basic challenge. The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) dataset provides continuous, globally available records, and CFSR data have produced satisfactory hydrological model performance in some temperate and monsoonal locations. However, the use of CFSR for hydrological modelling in tropical and semi-tropical basins has not been adequately evaluated. Taking advantage of exceptionally high rainfall station density in the catchments of the Rio Grande de Loiza above San Juan, Puerto Rico, we compared model performance based on CFSR records with that based on publicly available weather stations in the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN, n=21) and on a dataset of rainfall records maintained by the United States Geological Survey Caribbean Water Science Center (USGS, n=24). For an implementation of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) with subbasins defined at 11 streamflow gages, uncalibrated measures of Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) were >0 at 8 of 11 gages using USGS precipitation data for daily simulations over the period 1998-2012, but were <0 using GHCN weather station records (8 of 11) and CFSR reanalysis data (9 of 11). Autocalibration of individual SWAT models for each of the 11 basins against each of the available weather datasets yielded NSE values>0 using all precipitation inputs, including CFSR. However, the ground weather station closest to the geographic basin centre produced the highest NSE values in only 5 of 11 cases. The spatially interpolated CFSR data performed as well or better than single ground observations made further than 20-30km, and sometimes better than individual weather stations <10km from the basin centroid. In addition to demonstrating the need to evaluate available weather inputs, this research reinforces the value of CFSR data as a means to supplement ground records and consistently determine a baseline for hydrologic model performance. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
英文关键词 | precipitation;Soil and Water Assessment Tool;Climate Forecast System Reanalysis;Puerto Rico;tropical watershed modelling |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000383569200009 |
来源期刊 | HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/59384 |
作者单位 | 1.Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA; 2.Virginia Tech, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA USA; 3.Cornell Univ, Dept Biol & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY USA; 4.US EPA, Off Wetlands Oceans & Watersheds, Washington, DC 20004 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Auerbach, Daniel A.,Easton, Zachary M.,Walter, M. Todd,et al. Evaluating weather observations and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as inputs for hydrologic modelling in the tropics[J]. 美国环保署,2016,30(19):3466-3477. |
APA | Auerbach, Daniel A.,Easton, Zachary M.,Walter, M. Todd,Flecker, Alexander S.,&Fuka, Daniel R..(2016).Evaluating weather observations and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as inputs for hydrologic modelling in the tropics.HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES,30(19),3466-3477. |
MLA | Auerbach, Daniel A.,et al."Evaluating weather observations and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as inputs for hydrologic modelling in the tropics".HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES 30.19(2016):3466-3477. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。