Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s00267-012-0014-4 |
Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability | |
Dale, Virginia H.1; Kline, Keith L.1; Perla, Donna2; Lucier, Al3 | |
发表日期 | 2013-02-01 |
ISSN | 0364-152X |
卷号 | 51期号:2页码:279-290 |
英文摘要 | Defining and measuring sustainability of bioenergy systems are difficult because the systems are complex, the science is in early stages of development, and there is a need to generalize what are inherently context-specific enterprises. These challenges, and the fact that decisions are being made now, create a need for improved communications among scientists as well as between scientists and decision makers. In order for scientists to provide information that is useful to decision makers, they need to come to an agreement on how to measure and report potential risks and benefits of diverse energy alternatives in a way that allows decision makers to compare options. Scientists also need to develop approaches that contribute information about problems and opportunities relevant to policy and decision making. The need for clear communication is especially important at this time when there is a plethora of scientific papers and reports and it is difficult for the public or decision makers to assess the merits of each analysis. We propose three communication guidelines for scientists whose work can contribute to decision making: (1) relationships between the question and the analytical approach should be clearly defined and make common sense; (2) the information should be presented in a manner that non-scientists can understand; and (3) the implications of methods, assumptions, and limitations should be clear. The scientists' job is to analyze information to build a better understanding of environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic aspects of the sustainability of energy alternatives. The scientific process requires transparency, debate, review, and collaboration across disciplines and time. This paper serves as an introduction to the papers in the special issue on "Sustainability of Bioenergy Systems: Cradle to Grave" because scientific communication is essential to developing more sustainable energy systems. Together these four papers provide a framework under which the effects of bioenergy can be assessed and compared to other energy alternatives to foster sustainability. |
英文关键词 | Biofuels;Benefits;Communication;Costs;Decisions;Landscape design;Risk;Scale |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000314311300001 |
来源期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/59361 |
作者单位 | 1.Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA; 2.US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA; 3.Natl Council Air & Stream Improvement Inc, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dale, Virginia H.,Kline, Keith L.,Perla, Donna,et al. Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability[J]. 美国环保署,2013,51(2):279-290. |
APA | Dale, Virginia H.,Kline, Keith L.,Perla, Donna,&Lucier, Al.(2013).Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability.ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,51(2),279-290. |
MLA | Dale, Virginia H.,et al."Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability".ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 51.2(2013):279-290. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。