CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s00267-012-0014-4
Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability
Dale, Virginia H.1; Kline, Keith L.1; Perla, Donna2; Lucier, Al3
发表日期2013-02-01
ISSN0364-152X
卷号51期号:2页码:279-290
英文摘要

Defining and measuring sustainability of bioenergy systems are difficult because the systems are complex, the science is in early stages of development, and there is a need to generalize what are inherently context-specific enterprises. These challenges, and the fact that decisions are being made now, create a need for improved communications among scientists as well as between scientists and decision makers. In order for scientists to provide information that is useful to decision makers, they need to come to an agreement on how to measure and report potential risks and benefits of diverse energy alternatives in a way that allows decision makers to compare options. Scientists also need to develop approaches that contribute information about problems and opportunities relevant to policy and decision making. The need for clear communication is especially important at this time when there is a plethora of scientific papers and reports and it is difficult for the public or decision makers to assess the merits of each analysis. We propose three communication guidelines for scientists whose work can contribute to decision making: (1) relationships between the question and the analytical approach should be clearly defined and make common sense; (2) the information should be presented in a manner that non-scientists can understand; and (3) the implications of methods, assumptions, and limitations should be clear. The scientists' job is to analyze information to build a better understanding of environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic aspects of the sustainability of energy alternatives. The scientific process requires transparency, debate, review, and collaboration across disciplines and time. This paper serves as an introduction to the papers in the special issue on "Sustainability of Bioenergy Systems: Cradle to Grave" because scientific communication is essential to developing more sustainable energy systems. Together these four papers provide a framework under which the effects of bioenergy can be assessed and compared to other energy alternatives to foster sustainability.


英文关键词Biofuels;Benefits;Communication;Costs;Decisions;Landscape design;Risk;Scale
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000314311300001
来源期刊ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/59361
作者单位1.Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA;
2.US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA;
3.Natl Council Air & Stream Improvement Inc, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dale, Virginia H.,Kline, Keith L.,Perla, Donna,et al. Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability[J]. 美国环保署,2013,51(2):279-290.
APA Dale, Virginia H.,Kline, Keith L.,Perla, Donna,&Lucier, Al.(2013).Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability.ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,51(2),279-290.
MLA Dale, Virginia H.,et al."Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability".ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 51.2(2013):279-290.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dale, Virginia H.]的文章
[Kline, Keith L.]的文章
[Perla, Donna]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dale, Virginia H.]的文章
[Kline, Keith L.]的文章
[Perla, Donna]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dale, Virginia H.]的文章
[Kline, Keith L.]的文章
[Perla, Donna]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。