CCPortal
DOI10.1086/674982
Comparison of four species-delimitation methods applied to a DNA barcode data set of insect larvae for use in routine bioassessment
White, Bryan P.1; Pilgrim, Erik M.2; Boykin, Laura M.3; Stein, Eric D.1; Mazor, Raphael D.1
发表日期2014-03-01
ISSN2161-9549
卷号33期号:1页码:338-348
英文摘要

Species delimitation (grouping individuals into distinct taxonomic groups) is an essential part of evolutionary, conservation, and molecular ecology. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) barcodes, short fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, are being used in environmental bioassessments to assign specimens to putative species, but no method for delimiting DNA barcodes into species-level entities is universally accepted. We investigated the effect of delimitation methods on outcomes of bioassessments based on DNA barcodes. We used 2 tree-construction methods (neighbor joining [NJ], maximum likelihood [ML]) and 4 classes of species-delimitation criteria (distance-based, bootstrap support, reciprocal monophyly, and coalescentbased) with a DNA barcode data set consisting of 3 genera and 2202 COI sequences. We compared species delimitations for Baetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), Eukiefferiella (Diptera: Chironomidae), and Simulium (Diptera: Simuliidae) from different streams. We assessed congruence among trees and compared species abundances and estimated species richness among methods. NJ followed by use of a standard barcoding distance cutoff (2%) yielded the greatest number of putative species. All other delimitation methods yielded similar, but lower, richness. Differences in species delimitations produced by various methods might have been caused by confounding factors, such as possible parthenogenesis in Baetis and rare haplotypes in abundant species of Baetis and Simulium. Eukiefferiella presented the fewest discrepancies among delimitations. Each method can be regarded as producing a separate line of evidence contributing to the delimitation of separately evolving lineages. The increased resolution offered by DNA barcoding can yield important insights into the natural history of organisms, but the power of these observations is limited without the use of multigene and multilocus data sets. Key words: DNA barcoding, bioassessment, biomonitoring, species delimitation, coalescent theory, cytochrome


英文关键词DNA barcoding;bioassessment;biomonitoring;species delimitation;coalescent theory;cytochrome;oxidase I;COI;benthic macroinvertebrates;GMYC
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000332322400029
来源期刊FRESHWATER SCIENCE
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/59139
作者单位1.Southern Calif Coastal Water Res Project, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 USA;
2.US EPA, Ecol Exposure Res Div, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA;
3.Univ Western Australia, ARC Ctr Excellence, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
White, Bryan P.,Pilgrim, Erik M.,Boykin, Laura M.,et al. Comparison of four species-delimitation methods applied to a DNA barcode data set of insect larvae for use in routine bioassessment[J]. 美国环保署,2014,33(1):338-348.
APA White, Bryan P.,Pilgrim, Erik M.,Boykin, Laura M.,Stein, Eric D.,&Mazor, Raphael D..(2014).Comparison of four species-delimitation methods applied to a DNA barcode data set of insect larvae for use in routine bioassessment.FRESHWATER SCIENCE,33(1),338-348.
MLA White, Bryan P.,et al."Comparison of four species-delimitation methods applied to a DNA barcode data set of insect larvae for use in routine bioassessment".FRESHWATER SCIENCE 33.1(2014):338-348.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[White, Bryan P.]的文章
[Pilgrim, Erik M.]的文章
[Boykin, Laura M.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[White, Bryan P.]的文章
[Pilgrim, Erik M.]的文章
[Boykin, Laura M.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[White, Bryan P.]的文章
[Pilgrim, Erik M.]的文章
[Boykin, Laura M.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。