CCPortal
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aad74b
How clean is clean: a review of the social science of environmental cleanups
Maxwell, Keely; Kiessling, Brittany; Buckley, Jenifer
发表日期2018-08-01
ISSN1748-9326
卷号13期号:8
英文摘要

Environmental cleanup may involve decontaminating an area affected by a radiological release, containing an oil spill, or remediating a Superfund site or brownfield. It is a key component of how environmental agencies work to protect public health and the environment. There are many publications on technical protocols for cleanup and waste disposal. Additionally, there has been much social science work on the social problems of environmental contamination. However, social science research on cleanup itself has been much more scattered across disciplines and incidents. To date, there has not been a comprehensive review of the social factors that affect cleanup processes and outcomes. Such social factors may include cultural worldviews that shape stakeholder perspectives on 'how clean is clean' and social relationships among stakeholders. This article fills this gap by providing an interdisciplinary literature review of the social science of environmental cleanup. Three principal themes emerged from the 97 articles that met selection criteria: effects on cleanup worker health, public engagement and decision-making, and societal benefits of cleaned-up sites. The review points to areas where further research is needed. For example, there is a lack of mixed methods and interdisciplinary engagement within the literature. Additionally, few articles compare cleanup situations. There is also a need for further investigation into specific social science topics such as labor practices, gender, race, and power relationships. To address these gaps, we argue for the development of a comprehensive framework or model as well as the exploration of broader questions complicating cleanups. Overall, this area of research has significant potential to benefit environmental cleanup policy and practice worldwide, while advancing social theory about people and the environment.


英文关键词decontamination;remediation;social science;Superfund;brownfields;megasites;public engagement
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000442041300001
来源期刊ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/58641
作者单位US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Maxwell, Keely,Kiessling, Brittany,Buckley, Jenifer. How clean is clean: a review of the social science of environmental cleanups[J]. 美国环保署,2018,13(8).
APA Maxwell, Keely,Kiessling, Brittany,&Buckley, Jenifer.(2018).How clean is clean: a review of the social science of environmental cleanups.ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,13(8).
MLA Maxwell, Keely,et al."How clean is clean: a review of the social science of environmental cleanups".ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS 13.8(2018).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Maxwell, Keely]的文章
[Kiessling, Brittany]的文章
[Buckley, Jenifer]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Maxwell, Keely]的文章
[Kiessling, Brittany]的文章
[Buckley, Jenifer]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Maxwell, Keely]的文章
[Kiessling, Brittany]的文章
[Buckley, Jenifer]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。