Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1080/15287394.2014.922391 |
EVALUATING AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR RAPID URINARY CREATININE DETERMINATION | |
Andersen, Erik M.1; Sobus, Jon R.1; Strynar, Mark J.1; Pleil, Joachim D.1; Nakayama, Shoji F.2 | |
发表日期 | 2014 |
ISSN | 1528-7394 |
卷号 | 77期号:18页码:1114-1123 |
英文摘要 | Creatinine (CR) is an endogenously produced chemical that is routinely assayed in urine specimens to assess kidney function and sample dilution. The industry-standard method for CR determination, known as the kinetic Jaffe (KJ) method, relies on an exponential rate of a colorimetric change, and can therefore require automated processing equipment for moderateto high-throughput analysis (hundreds to thousands of samples per day). This study evaluates an alternative colorimetric method, the "plateau Jaffe" (PJ) method, which utilizes the chemistry of the KJ method, a commercially available kit, and a multipoint calibration curve. This method is amenable to moderate-throughput sample analysis and does not require automated processing equipment. Thirty-two spot urine samples from healthy adult volunteers were analyzed for creatinine concentration (CRc) using the KJ and PJ methods. Samples were also analyzed using a liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF/MS) method, which acted as an analytical control. Replicate measurements of spot samples (natural log-transformed values) were used to estimate method precision, and linear regression models were used to evaluate method accuracy (LC-TOF/MS measurements were considered the analytical benchmark). Measurement precision was comparable across all three methods, with coefficent of variation estimates ranging from 3 to 6%. Regression models generally showed good agreement across methods with R-2 estimates ranging from .996 to .998, slope estimates ranging from .944 to .986, and y-intercept estimates ranging from 0.111 to 0.303. Minor bias (between 2 and 16%) was observed across methods at the tails of the measurement distributions. The provided regression equations can be used to adjust for this bias and to improve CR measurement comparisons across studies employing different methods. Considering these results, the PJ method is a suitable alternative to the industry standard KJ method for urinary CRc determination. It can be implemented for moderate-throughput sample analysis using modest and commonly available lab instrumentation and manual sample preparation techniques. |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000340280200006 |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/57654 |
作者单位 | 1.US EPA, Human Exposure & Atmospher Sci Div, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA; 2.Natl Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Environm Hlth Sci, Integrated Hlth Risk Assessment Sect, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Andersen, Erik M.,Sobus, Jon R.,Strynar, Mark J.,et al. EVALUATING AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR RAPID URINARY CREATININE DETERMINATION[J]. 美国环保署,2014,77(18):1114-1123. |
APA | Andersen, Erik M.,Sobus, Jon R.,Strynar, Mark J.,Pleil, Joachim D.,&Nakayama, Shoji F..(2014).EVALUATING AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR RAPID URINARY CREATININE DETERMINATION.JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES,77(18),1114-1123. |
MLA | Andersen, Erik M.,et al."EVALUATING AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR RAPID URINARY CREATININE DETERMINATION".JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES 77.18(2014):1114-1123. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。