CCPortal
DOI10.1039/c5gc00056d
Can pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs) be used to assess implementation and effectiveness of green chemistry practices? A case study involving the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and pharmaceutical manufacturers
DeVito, Stephen C.1; Keenan, Cheryl2; Lazarus, Dana2
发表日期2015
ISSN1463-9262
卷号17期号:5页码:2679-2692
英文摘要

Pharmaceutical firms have reported that implementation of green chemistry practices in their manufacturing processes have significantly reduced the quantities of toxic chemicals they use, release to the environment, or otherwise manage as waste. Using the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) database and literature publications, we conducted research to assess this claim. Our analyses show that over the 2002 through 2011 timeframe the quantities of toxic chemicals reported annually by pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities to EPA's TRI Program as released to the environment or otherwise managed as waste have declined steadily and by more than 60%. The large reductions in the reported quantities are sector-wide, and it appears that factors such as outsourcing, production levels, regulations, shifts to other waste management practices, or TRI reporting characteristics by the larger pharmaceutical firms are not driving the decline. Our analyses, combined with the extensive evidence in the literature of green chemistry advances within the pharma sector, lead us to conclude that implementation of green chemistry practices is a major contributing factor to the large reductions we report herein. We believe the TRI, an easy-to-use pollution prevention tool used extensively for tracking environmental performance, is uniquely well-suited for assessing the progress made by different industry sectors or specific facilities therein in implementing green chemistry practices and the effectiveness that such practices have in preventing pollution: uses of the TRI that hitherto have not been reported. Moreover, our findings indicate that other pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs) may have the potential to be used for these purposes as well.


语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000354409500006
来源期刊GREEN CHEMISTRY
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/57549
作者单位1.US EPA, Tox Release Inventory Program, Washington, DC 20460 USA;
2.Abt Associates Inc, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
DeVito, Stephen C.,Keenan, Cheryl,Lazarus, Dana. Can pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs) be used to assess implementation and effectiveness of green chemistry practices? A case study involving the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and pharmaceutical manufacturers[J]. 美国环保署,2015,17(5):2679-2692.
APA DeVito, Stephen C.,Keenan, Cheryl,&Lazarus, Dana.(2015).Can pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs) be used to assess implementation and effectiveness of green chemistry practices? A case study involving the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and pharmaceutical manufacturers.GREEN CHEMISTRY,17(5),2679-2692.
MLA DeVito, Stephen C.,et al."Can pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs) be used to assess implementation and effectiveness of green chemistry practices? A case study involving the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and pharmaceutical manufacturers".GREEN CHEMISTRY 17.5(2015):2679-2692.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[DeVito, Stephen C.]的文章
[Keenan, Cheryl]的文章
[Lazarus, Dana]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[DeVito, Stephen C.]的文章
[Keenan, Cheryl]的文章
[Lazarus, Dana]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[DeVito, Stephen C.]的文章
[Keenan, Cheryl]的文章
[Lazarus, Dana]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。