CCPortal
DOI10.3354/esr01283
Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions
Tuohy, Paris; Richards, Shane A.; Cvitanovic, Christopher; van Putten, Ingrid; Hobday, Alistair J.; Thomas, Linda; Annand-Jones, Ruby
发表日期2024
ISSN1863-5407
EISSN1613-4796
起始页码53
卷号53
英文摘要Sea turtles are facing significant threats, including anthropogenic warming, predation from feral animals, and sea level rise. While a range of intervention options are available, resource constraints and increasing time pressures means managers face the difficult task of prioritising options. To achieve successful conservation outcomes, managers are increasingly seeking to understand the social acceptability, as well as biological plausibility and economic feasibility, of these intervention options. Previous studies have used expert opinion as predictors of social acceptability, given their technical knowledge and experience implementing the interventions; however, the assumption that the social acceptability of interventions is the same for both the general public and experts is largely untested. We tested this assumption using surveys to assess the social acceptability of 24 interventions proposed for a population of flatback turtles Natator depressus in northwest Australia. Survey responses were collected from community members (residents) and experts (resource managers and researchers). Experts were asked to provide their own opinion of acceptability and how they perceived community members would rate intervention options. In general, residents ranked interventions that directly intervene with human behaviour or the environment as more acceptable than those that directly target turtles, while experts tended to favour direct turtle interventions. Experts incorrectly predicted that the community would not be influenced by the target of the intervention. Our findings highlight the importance of understanding social acceptability of interventions before implementation to inform management decisions and engagement and communication strategies, particularly when interventions might be controversial or restrict human behaviour directly.
英文关键词Natator depressus; Decision-making; Conservation; Public participation; Marine species; Adaptation
语种英语
WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation
WOS类目Biodiversity Conservation
WOS记录号WOS:001217046600018
来源期刊ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/301541
作者单位University of Tasmania; University of Tasmania; University of New South Wales Sydney; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Australian National University
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Tuohy, Paris,Richards, Shane A.,Cvitanovic, Christopher,et al. Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions[J],2024,53.
APA Tuohy, Paris.,Richards, Shane A..,Cvitanovic, Christopher.,van Putten, Ingrid.,Hobday, Alistair J..,...&Annand-Jones, Ruby.(2024).Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions.ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH,53.
MLA Tuohy, Paris,et al."Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions".ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH 53(2024).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Tuohy, Paris]的文章
[Richards, Shane A.]的文章
[Cvitanovic, Christopher]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Tuohy, Paris]的文章
[Richards, Shane A.]的文章
[Cvitanovic, Christopher]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Tuohy, Paris]的文章
[Richards, Shane A.]的文章
[Cvitanovic, Christopher]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。