Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.3354/esr01283 |
Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions | |
Tuohy, Paris; Richards, Shane A.; Cvitanovic, Christopher; van Putten, Ingrid; Hobday, Alistair J.; Thomas, Linda; Annand-Jones, Ruby | |
发表日期 | 2024 |
ISSN | 1863-5407 |
EISSN | 1613-4796 |
起始页码 | 53 |
卷号 | 53 |
英文摘要 | Sea turtles are facing significant threats, including anthropogenic warming, predation from feral animals, and sea level rise. While a range of intervention options are available, resource constraints and increasing time pressures means managers face the difficult task of prioritising options. To achieve successful conservation outcomes, managers are increasingly seeking to understand the social acceptability, as well as biological plausibility and economic feasibility, of these intervention options. Previous studies have used expert opinion as predictors of social acceptability, given their technical knowledge and experience implementing the interventions; however, the assumption that the social acceptability of interventions is the same for both the general public and experts is largely untested. We tested this assumption using surveys to assess the social acceptability of 24 interventions proposed for a population of flatback turtles Natator depressus in northwest Australia. Survey responses were collected from community members (residents) and experts (resource managers and researchers). Experts were asked to provide their own opinion of acceptability and how they perceived community members would rate intervention options. In general, residents ranked interventions that directly intervene with human behaviour or the environment as more acceptable than those that directly target turtles, while experts tended to favour direct turtle interventions. Experts incorrectly predicted that the community would not be influenced by the target of the intervention. Our findings highlight the importance of understanding social acceptability of interventions before implementation to inform management decisions and engagement and communication strategies, particularly when interventions might be controversial or restrict human behaviour directly. |
英文关键词 | Natator depressus; Decision-making; Conservation; Public participation; Marine species; Adaptation |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS研究方向 | Biodiversity & Conservation |
WOS类目 | Biodiversity Conservation |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001217046600018 |
来源期刊 | ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/301541 |
作者单位 | University of Tasmania; University of Tasmania; University of New South Wales Sydney; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Australian National University |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Tuohy, Paris,Richards, Shane A.,Cvitanovic, Christopher,et al. Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions[J],2024,53. |
APA | Tuohy, Paris.,Richards, Shane A..,Cvitanovic, Christopher.,van Putten, Ingrid.,Hobday, Alistair J..,...&Annand-Jones, Ruby.(2024).Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions.ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH,53. |
MLA | Tuohy, Paris,et al."Social acceptability of conservation interventions for flatback turtles: comparing expert and public perceptions".ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH 53(2024). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。