Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s12286-024-00599-7 |
Just transformations through resilience experiments? Comparing policy rationales and narratives of the Global South and North in the Resilient Cities Network | |
Kochskaemper, Elisa | |
发表日期 | 2024 |
ISSN | 1865-2646 |
EISSN | 1865-2654 |
英文摘要 | The Resilient Cities Network, formerly known as the 100 Resilient Cities, supports the development of local resilience policies in partaking cities from around the globe. Various policies in the network are an example of an upcoming trend where experiments are increasingly conducted in the urban space to shape governance. Experiments in this context are purposeful interventions to increase resilience through learning and the temporal and spatial diffusion of results. Experimentation and resilience are highlighted in the literature on political ecology for policies presumably leading to urban transformations. Both approaches face strikingly similar critiques, namely that related rationales and narratives frequently maintain the political and economic status quo and reproduce socially unjust urban realities. However, they are rarely examined together and empirical findings are missing when it comes to comparative research; particularly between the Global South and North. Against this background, this paper asks: Which role plays social justice in rationales and narratives of resilience experiments in Global South and Global North cities? I examine experimental policy actions in Global South and North cities of the Resilient Cities Network (N = 112) qualitatively through an analytic lens that links a social justice understanding to the setting, agency, and design of resilience experiments. Based on this analysis, I compare the results to explore emerging patterns of the role given to social justice in urban resilience experimentation across cities of the Global South and North. The findings show that narratives in Global North cities revolve stronger around recognising social justice, but Global South cities put more emphasis on marginalised groups and learning mechanisms that potentially foster social justice through output legitimacy. |
英文关键词 | Local government; Climate policy; Transnational municipal network; Social justice; Medium-sized comparative study |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS研究方向 | Government & Law |
WOS类目 | Political Science |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001208735100001 |
来源期刊 | ZEITSCHRIFT FUR VERGLEICHENDE POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/301149 |
作者单位 | Leibniz Institut fur Raumbezogene Sozialforschung (IRS); University of Potsdam |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kochskaemper, Elisa. Just transformations through resilience experiments? Comparing policy rationales and narratives of the Global South and North in the Resilient Cities Network[J],2024. |
APA | Kochskaemper, Elisa.(2024).Just transformations through resilience experiments? Comparing policy rationales and narratives of the Global South and North in the Resilient Cities Network.ZEITSCHRIFT FUR VERGLEICHENDE POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT. |
MLA | Kochskaemper, Elisa."Just transformations through resilience experiments? Comparing policy rationales and narratives of the Global South and North in the Resilient Cities Network".ZEITSCHRIFT FUR VERGLEICHENDE POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT (2024). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Kochskaemper, Elisa]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Kochskaemper, Elisa]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Kochskaemper, Elisa]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。