气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions

CCPortal

DOI	10.1038/s41558-024-01960-0
	Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions
	Buma, B.; Gordon, D. R.; Kleisner, K. M.; Bartuska, A.; Bidlack, A.; DeFries, R.; Ellis, P.; Friedlingstein, P.; Metzger, S.; Morgan, G.; Novick, K.; Sanchirico, J. N.; Collins, J. R.; Eagle, A. J.; Fujita, R.; Holst, E.; Lavallee, J. M.; Lubowski, R. N.; Melikov, C.; Moore, L. A.; Oldfield, E. E.; Paltseva, J.; Raffeld, A. M.; Randazzo, N. A.; Schneider, C.; Aragon, N. Uludere; Hamburg, S. P.
发表日期	2024
ISSN	1758-678X
EISSN	1758-6798
起始页码	14
结束页码	4
卷号	14 期号:4
英文摘要	Viable nature-based climate solutions (NbCS) are needed to achieve climate goals expressed in international agreements like the Paris Accord. Many NbCS pathways have strong scientific foundations and can deliver meaningful climate benefits but effective mitigation is undermined by pathways with less scientific certainty. Here we couple an extensive literature review with an expert elicitation on 43 pathways and find that at present the most used pathways, such as tropical forest conservation, have a solid scientific basis for mitigation. However, the experts suggested that some pathways, many with carbon credit eligibility and market activity, remain uncertain in terms of their climate mitigation efficacy. Sources of uncertainty include incomplete GHG measurement and accounting. We recommend focusing on resolving those uncertainties before broadly scaling implementation of those pathways in quantitative emission or sequestration mitigation plans. If appropriate, those pathways should be supported for their cobenefits, such as biodiversity and food security. Nature-based climate solutions are widely incorporated into climate change mitigation plans and need firm scientific foundations. Through literature review and expert elicitation, this analysis shows that for some major pathways there is strong support, while for others their efficacy remains uncertain.
语种	英语
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WOS类目	Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WOS记录号	WOS:001190197500001
来源期刊	NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/293282
作者单位	Environmental Defense Fund; University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Denver; State University System of Florida; University of Florida; Resources for the Future; University of Alaska System; University of Alaska Fairbanks; Columbia University; Columbia University; Nature Conservancy; University of Exeter; Sorbonne Universite; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universite Paris Saclay; Institut Polytechnique de Paris; Ecole Polytechnique; Universite Paris Cite; Universite PSL; Carnegie Mellon University; Indiana University System; Indiana University Bloomington; University of California System; University of California Davis; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; University of Wisconsin System; University of Wisconsin Madison; National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA); NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; University System of Maryland; University of Maryland College Park; University of Montana System; University of Montana
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Buma, B.,Gordon, D. R.,Kleisner, K. M.,et al. Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions[J],2024,14(4).
APA	Buma, B..,Gordon, D. R..,Kleisner, K. M..,Bartuska, A..,Bidlack, A..,...&Hamburg, S. P..(2024).Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions.NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE,14(4).
MLA	Buma, B.,et al."Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions".NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE 14.4(2024).