Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107122 |
Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado | |
Lucchesi, Andrea; Khanna, Madhu; Pereda, Paula C.; Ussami, Keyi A.; Ruggiero, Patricia G. C.; Dornelas, Victor S.; Lallement, Tess | |
发表日期 | 2024 |
ISSN | 0264-8377 |
EISSN | 1873-5754 |
起始页码 | 141 |
卷号 | 141 |
英文摘要 | Ecosystem restoration is an important tool for reducing ecosystem loss and contribute to diminish the negative impacts from deriving from climate change, but can be very costly. This paper focuses on the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of recovering almost one million hectares of legally protected areas in the Araguaia Biodiversity Corridor (Brazil) following the Brazilian Forest code regulation. We analyze two paths for recovery, ecological and economic (including timber and agroforestry systems). We consider the direct and indirect local costs, as well as monetized environmental benefits using the social cost of carbon and avoided soil erosion. According to our estimates, in 50 years, the recovery of the Araguaia Corridor will lead to net societal benefits with either the ecological (US$ 19.8 billion) or economic (US$ 18.9 billion) pathways in all macro-regions (north, central, and south) and rural property sizes (small, medium and large). The recovery captures 262 million tCO2eq and avoids 527 million tons of soil erosion with the economic path; these estimates are 23% and 1.7% higher, respectively, when using the ecological path. Importantly, we show that the restoration activity is not carbon credit dependent on being profitable when based on the economic path proposed. Additionally, this study highlights the high profitability of agroforestry systems, especially in small farms. There are also relevant local impacts, from 12 to 38 thousand new direct jobs. Even considering a limited menu of ecosystem services (carbon and soil), we show that social benefits from the Araguaia biodiversity corridor restoration exceed its social costs, justifying the subsidization of ecosystem restoration. In this sense, land use policies can incorporate mechanisms for financial support, grants, or incentives to encourage and facilitate ecosystem restoration efforts in the region. |
英文关键词 | Ecological reforestation; Carbon capture and social cost of carbon; Avoided soil erosion and replacement cost; Amazon and Cerrado recovery; Cost benefit analysis; Climate change economics |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
WOS类目 | Environmental Studies |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001223985100001 |
来源期刊 | LAND USE POLICY
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/290144 |
作者单位 | Universidade de Sao Paulo; University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Cornell University |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lucchesi, Andrea,Khanna, Madhu,Pereda, Paula C.,et al. Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado[J],2024,141. |
APA | Lucchesi, Andrea.,Khanna, Madhu.,Pereda, Paula C..,Ussami, Keyi A..,Ruggiero, Patricia G. C..,...&Lallement, Tess.(2024).Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado.LAND USE POLICY,141. |
MLA | Lucchesi, Andrea,et al."Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado".LAND USE POLICY 141(2024). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。