CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107122
Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado
Lucchesi, Andrea; Khanna, Madhu; Pereda, Paula C.; Ussami, Keyi A.; Ruggiero, Patricia G. C.; Dornelas, Victor S.; Lallement, Tess
发表日期2024
ISSN0264-8377
EISSN1873-5754
起始页码141
卷号141
英文摘要Ecosystem restoration is an important tool for reducing ecosystem loss and contribute to diminish the negative impacts from deriving from climate change, but can be very costly. This paper focuses on the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of recovering almost one million hectares of legally protected areas in the Araguaia Biodiversity Corridor (Brazil) following the Brazilian Forest code regulation. We analyze two paths for recovery, ecological and economic (including timber and agroforestry systems). We consider the direct and indirect local costs, as well as monetized environmental benefits using the social cost of carbon and avoided soil erosion. According to our estimates, in 50 years, the recovery of the Araguaia Corridor will lead to net societal benefits with either the ecological (US$ 19.8 billion) or economic (US$ 18.9 billion) pathways in all macro-regions (north, central, and south) and rural property sizes (small, medium and large). The recovery captures 262 million tCO2eq and avoids 527 million tons of soil erosion with the economic path; these estimates are 23% and 1.7% higher, respectively, when using the ecological path. Importantly, we show that the restoration activity is not carbon credit dependent on being profitable when based on the economic path proposed. Additionally, this study highlights the high profitability of agroforestry systems, especially in small farms. There are also relevant local impacts, from 12 to 38 thousand new direct jobs. Even considering a limited menu of ecosystem services (carbon and soil), we show that social benefits from the Araguaia biodiversity corridor restoration exceed its social costs, justifying the subsidization of ecosystem restoration. In this sense, land use policies can incorporate mechanisms for financial support, grants, or incentives to encourage and facilitate ecosystem restoration efforts in the region.
英文关键词Ecological reforestation; Carbon capture and social cost of carbon; Avoided soil erosion and replacement cost; Amazon and Cerrado recovery; Cost benefit analysis; Climate change economics
语种英语
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
WOS类目Environmental Studies
WOS记录号WOS:001223985100001
来源期刊LAND USE POLICY
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/290144
作者单位Universidade de Sao Paulo; University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Cornell University
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lucchesi, Andrea,Khanna, Madhu,Pereda, Paula C.,et al. Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado[J],2024,141.
APA Lucchesi, Andrea.,Khanna, Madhu.,Pereda, Paula C..,Ussami, Keyi A..,Ruggiero, Patricia G. C..,...&Lallement, Tess.(2024).Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado.LAND USE POLICY,141.
MLA Lucchesi, Andrea,et al."Araguaia biodiversity corridor cost benefit analysis: Large scale restoration and sustainable agribusiness in Amazon and Cerrado".LAND USE POLICY 141(2024).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Lucchesi, Andrea]的文章
[Khanna, Madhu]的文章
[Pereda, Paula C.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Lucchesi, Andrea]的文章
[Khanna, Madhu]的文章
[Pereda, Paula C.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Lucchesi, Andrea]的文章
[Khanna, Madhu]的文章
[Pereda, Paula C.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。