Climate Change Data Portal
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120804 |
| Forest, climate, and policy literature lacks acknowledgement of environmental justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion | |
| 发表日期 | 2024 |
| ISSN | 0301-4797 |
| EISSN | 1095-8630 |
| 起始页码 | 358 |
| 卷号 | 358 |
| 英文摘要 | Forests boast essential resources and potential to mitigate climate change, meriting the development of conservation policies on all governmental scales. Ecosystem services provided by forests, including biodiversity, air quality, and food and fuel production, make forests valuable assets for climate-vulnerable communities that often lack the means to cope with ecosystem service degradation resulting from climate change. Historically, these vulnerable communities are previously marginalized and socio-economically limited, and climate change augments already-existing injustices. Policy discussions around managing forests and carbon, therefore, must consider environmental justice as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion to better meet the needs of all constituents. Using R, we perform a review of forest, climate, and policy peer-reviewed literature published between 2018 and 2021 for prevalence of topics related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ). We select DEIJ terms a priori and a posteriori based on our understanding of DEIJ and common considerations of the literature. Out of 2891 unique articles, 15.7% of literature mentioned at least one DEIJ term in the title, keyword list, or abstract. We identify which journals have published DEIJ literature more often in the context of forest, climate, and policy, and we perform a co-occurrence analysis of additional common themes. Concepts such as ecosystem services and economics appeared often in the literature, as well as REDD+ as a specifically mentioned policy. We call for increased consideration of DEIJ in forest, climate, and policy discussions and literature, as vulnerable communities historically have been excluded from and victimized by the conversations held among large, economically motivated entities. |
| 英文关键词 | Literature review; Participatory governance; Land management; Representation; Developing countries; Well-being |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:001224894300001 |
| 来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
 |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/286745 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | . Forest, climate, and policy literature lacks acknowledgement of environmental justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion[J],2024,358. |
| APA | (2024).Forest, climate, and policy literature lacks acknowledgement of environmental justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion.JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,358. |
| MLA | "Forest, climate, and policy literature lacks acknowledgement of environmental justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion".JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 358(2024). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
