Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104591 |
Transforming US urban green infrastructure planning to address equity | |
Grabowski, Zbigniew J.; McPhearson, Timon; Pickett, Steward T. A. | |
发表日期 | 2023 |
ISSN | 0169-2046 |
EISSN | 1872-6062 |
卷号 | 229 |
英文摘要 | Cities across the Unites States have embraced green infrastructure (GI) in official planning efforts. The plans conceptualize GI as providing multiple functions and benefits for urban residents, and form part of complex responses to intersectional urban challenges of social injustice and inequity, climate change, aging and expensive infrastructure, and socio-economic change. To date, it is unclear whether official city GI programs address systemic racism and urban inequality. To fill this knowledge gap, we coded and analyzed 122 formal plans from 20 US cities to examine if and how they address equity and justice in three domains: visions, processes, and distributions. We find a widespread failure of plans to conceptualize and operationalize equity planning principles. Only 13% of plans define equity or justice. Only 30% of cities recognize that they are on Native land. Over 90% of plans do not utilize inclusive processes to plan, design, implement, or evaluate GI, and so target many communities for green improvements without their consent. Although 80% of plans use GI to manage hazards and provide multiple benefits with GI, less than 10% identify the causes of uneven distributions and vulnerability. Even fewer recognize related issues of houselessness and gentrification. Very few plans have mechanisms to build community wealth through new GI jobs. We find promising seeds of best practices in some cities and plan types, but no plan exemplified best practices across all equity dimensions. If formal GI planning in US cities does not explicitly and comprehensively address equity concerns, it may reproduce the inequalities that GI is meant to alleviate. Based on our results, we identify-three key needs to improve current GI planning practices for green infrastructure and equity. First, clear definitions of equity and justice are needed, second, planning must engage with causes of inequality and displacement, and third, urban GI planning needs to be transformed through a focus on inclusion. |
英文关键词 | Equity; Green infrastructure; Urban planning; USA; Environmental justice |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS研究方向 | Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Geography ; Geography, Physical ; Regional & Urban Planning ; Urban Studies |
WOS类目 | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) ; Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001029170200001 |
来源期刊 | LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/280918 |
作者单位 | The New School; Technical University of Munich; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies; Stockholm University |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Grabowski, Zbigniew J.,McPhearson, Timon,Pickett, Steward T. A.. Transforming US urban green infrastructure planning to address equity[J],2023,229. |
APA | Grabowski, Zbigniew J.,McPhearson, Timon,&Pickett, Steward T. A..(2023).Transforming US urban green infrastructure planning to address equity.LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,229. |
MLA | Grabowski, Zbigniew J.,et al."Transforming US urban green infrastructure planning to address equity".LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 229(2023). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。