CCPortal
DOI10.5194/acp-22-15527-2022
Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions
Kelly, Bryce F. J.; Lu, Xinyi; Harris, Stephen J.; Neininger, Bruno G.; Hacker, Jorg M.; Schwietzke, Stefan; Fisher, Rebecca E.; France, James L.; Nisbet, Euan G.; Lowry, David; van der Veen, Carina; Menoud, Malika; Rockmann, Thomas
发表日期2022
ISSN1680-7316
EISSN1680-7324
起始页码15527
结束页码15558
卷号22期号:23页码:32
英文摘要In-flight measurements of atmospheric methane (CH4(a)) and mass balance flux quantification studies can assist with verification and improvement in the UNFCCC National Inventory reported CH4 emissions. In the Surat Basin gas fields, Queensland, Australia, coal seam gas (CSG) production and cattle farming are two of the major sources of CH4 emissions into the atmosphere. Because of the rapid mixing of adjacent plumes within the convective boundary layer, spatially attributing CH4(a) mole fraction readings to one or more emission sources is difficult. The primary aims of this study were to use the CH4(a) isotopic composition (delta C-13) of in-flight atmospheric air (IFAA) samples to assess where the bottom-up (BU) inventory developed specifically for the region was well characterised and to identify gaps in the BU inventory (missing sources or over- and underestimated source categories). Secondary aims were to investigate whether IFAA samples collected downwind of predominantly similar inventory sources were useable for characterising the isotopic signature of CH4 sources (delta C-13) and to identify mitigation opportunities.IFAA samples were collected between 100-350 m above ground level (m a.g.l.) over a 2-week period in September 2018. For each IFAA sample the 2 h back-trajectory footprint area was determined using the NOAA HYSPLIT atmospheric trajectory modelling application. IFAA samples were gathered into sets, where the 2 h upwind BU inventory had > 50 % attributable to a single predominant CH4 source (CSG, grazing cattle, or cattle feedlots). Keeling models were globally fitted to these sets using multiple regression with shared parameters (background-air CH4(b) and delta C-13). For IFAA samples collected from 250-350 m a.g.l. altitude, the best-fit delta C-13 signatures compare well with the ground observation: CSG delta C-13 of -55.4 parts per thousand (confidence interval (CI) 95 % +/- 13.7 parts per thousand) versus delta C-13 of -56.7 parts per thousand to -45.6 parts per thousand; grazing cattle delta C-13 of -60.5 parts per thousand (CI 95 % +/- 15.6 parts per thousand) versus -61.7 parts per thousand to -57.5 parts per thousand. For cattle feedlots, the derived delta C-13 (-69.6 parts per thousand, CI 95 % +/- 22.6 parts per thousand), was isotopically lighter than the ground-based study (delta C-13 from -65.2 parts per thousand to -60.3 parts per thousand) but within agreement given the large uncertainty for this source. For IFAA samples collected between 100-200 m a.g.l. the delta C-13 signature for the CSG set (-65.4 parts per thousand, CI 95 % +/- 13.3 parts per thousand) was isotopically lighter than expected, suggesting a BU inventory knowledge gap or the need to extend the population statistics for CSG delta C-13 signatures. For the 100-200 m a.g.l. set collected over grazing cattle districts the delta C-13 signature (-53.8 parts per thousand, CI 95 % +/- 17.4 parts per thousand) was heavier than expected from the BU inventory. An isotopically light set had a low delta C-13 signature of -80.2 parts per thousand (CI 95 % +/- 4.7 parts per thousand). A CH4 source with this low delta C-13 signature has not been incorporated into existing BU inventories for the region. Possible sources include termites and CSG brine ponds. If the excess emissions are from the brine ponds, they can potentially be mitigated. It is concluded that in-flight atmospheric delta C-13 measurements used in conjunction with endmember mixing modelling of CH4 sources are powerful tools for BU inventory verification.
学科领域Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
语种英语
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WOS记录号WOS:000896966500001
来源期刊ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/273356
作者单位University of New South Wales Sydney; Flinders University South Australia; Environmental Defense Fund; University of London; Royal Holloway University London; Utrecht University
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kelly, Bryce F. J.,Lu, Xinyi,Harris, Stephen J.,et al. Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions[J],2022,22(23):32.
APA Kelly, Bryce F. J..,Lu, Xinyi.,Harris, Stephen J..,Neininger, Bruno G..,Hacker, Jorg M..,...&Rockmann, Thomas.(2022).Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions.ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS,22(23),32.
MLA Kelly, Bryce F. J.,et al."Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions".ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 22.23(2022):32.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kelly, Bryce F. J.]的文章
[Lu, Xinyi]的文章
[Harris, Stephen J.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kelly, Bryce F. J.]的文章
[Lu, Xinyi]的文章
[Harris, Stephen J.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kelly, Bryce F. J.]的文章
[Lu, Xinyi]的文章
[Harris, Stephen J.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。