CCPortal
DOI10.1038/s41893-022-00866-z
Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management
Hegwood, Margaret; Langendorf, Ryan E.; Burgess, Matthew G.
发表日期2022
ISSN2398-9629
起始页码674
结束页码680
卷号5期号:8页码:7
英文摘要High-profile modelling studies often project that large-scale win-win solutions are widely available, but practitioners are often sceptical of win-win narratives, due to real-world complexity. Here we bridge this divide by showing mathematically why complexity makes win-wins elusive. We provide a general proof that increasing the number of objectives, the number of stakeholders or the number of constraints decreases the availability of win-win outcomes (here meaning Pareto improvements). We also show that a measure of tradeoff severity increases in the number of objectives. As the number of objectives approaches infinity, we show that this tradeoff severity measure approaches a limit unaffected by the curvature of the tradeoff surface. This is surprising because concave tradeoff-surface curvature results in less severe tradeoffs with fewer objectives. Our theory suggests that this difference gradually dissipates as objectives are added. In a meta-analysis, we show that 77% of empirically estimated two-objective tradeoff surfaces are concave. We then show how to approximately extrapolate our tradeoff severity measure to higher numbers of objectives, starting from estimated tradeoffs between fewer objectives. Our results provide modellers with precise intuition into practitioners' scepticism of win-win narratives and practitioners with guidance for assessing the implications of simple tradeoff models. Modelling studies suggest that large-scale win-win solutions are available, but practitioners confronted with real-world complexity are sceptical. This study shows that increasing the number of objectives, the number of stakeholders or the number of constraints decreases the availability of win-win outcomes.
学科领域Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
语种英语
WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
WOS记录号WOS:000780305100001
来源期刊NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/272773
作者单位University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder; University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder; University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hegwood, Margaret,Langendorf, Ryan E.,Burgess, Matthew G.. Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management[J],2022,5(8):7.
APA Hegwood, Margaret,Langendorf, Ryan E.,&Burgess, Matthew G..(2022).Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management.NATURE SUSTAINABILITY,5(8),7.
MLA Hegwood, Margaret,et al."Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management".NATURE SUSTAINABILITY 5.8(2022):7.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hegwood, Margaret]的文章
[Langendorf, Ryan E.]的文章
[Burgess, Matthew G.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hegwood, Margaret]的文章
[Langendorf, Ryan E.]的文章
[Burgess, Matthew G.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hegwood, Margaret]的文章
[Langendorf, Ryan E.]的文章
[Burgess, Matthew G.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。