Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1038/s41893-022-00866-z |
Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management | |
Hegwood, Margaret; Langendorf, Ryan E.; Burgess, Matthew G. | |
发表日期 | 2022 |
ISSN | 2398-9629 |
起始页码 | 674 |
结束页码 | 680 |
卷号 | 5期号:8页码:7 |
英文摘要 | High-profile modelling studies often project that large-scale win-win solutions are widely available, but practitioners are often sceptical of win-win narratives, due to real-world complexity. Here we bridge this divide by showing mathematically why complexity makes win-wins elusive. We provide a general proof that increasing the number of objectives, the number of stakeholders or the number of constraints decreases the availability of win-win outcomes (here meaning Pareto improvements). We also show that a measure of tradeoff severity increases in the number of objectives. As the number of objectives approaches infinity, we show that this tradeoff severity measure approaches a limit unaffected by the curvature of the tradeoff surface. This is surprising because concave tradeoff-surface curvature results in less severe tradeoffs with fewer objectives. Our theory suggests that this difference gradually dissipates as objectives are added. In a meta-analysis, we show that 77% of empirically estimated two-objective tradeoff surfaces are concave. We then show how to approximately extrapolate our tradeoff severity measure to higher numbers of objectives, starting from estimated tradeoffs between fewer objectives. Our results provide modellers with precise intuition into practitioners' scepticism of win-win narratives and practitioners with guidance for assessing the implications of simple tradeoff models. Modelling studies suggest that large-scale win-win solutions are available, but practitioners confronted with real-world complexity are sceptical. This study shows that increasing the number of objectives, the number of stakeholders or the number of constraints decreases the availability of win-win outcomes. |
学科领域 | Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000780305100001 |
来源期刊 | NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/272773 |
作者单位 | University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder; University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder; University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Hegwood, Margaret,Langendorf, Ryan E.,Burgess, Matthew G.. Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management[J],2022,5(8):7. |
APA | Hegwood, Margaret,Langendorf, Ryan E.,&Burgess, Matthew G..(2022).Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management.NATURE SUSTAINABILITY,5(8),7. |
MLA | Hegwood, Margaret,et al."Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management".NATURE SUSTAINABILITY 5.8(2022):7. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。