气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102472
	Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries
	Baptista L.B.; Schaeffer R.; van Soest H.L.; Fragkos P.; Rochedo P.R.R.; van Vuuren D.; Dewi R.G.; Iyer G.; Jiang K.; Kannavou M.; Macaluso N.; Oshiro K.; Park C.; Reedman L.J.; Safonov G.; Shekhar S.; Siagian U.; Surana K.; Qimin C.
发表日期	2022
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	73
英文摘要	One key aspect of the Paris Agreement is the goal to limit the global average temperature increase to well below 2 °C by the end of the century. To achieve the Paris Agreement goals, countries need to submit, and periodically update, their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Recent studies show that NDCs and currently implemented national policies are not sufficient to cover the ambition level of the temperature limit agreed upon in the Paris Agreement, meaning that we need to collectively increase climate action to stabilize global warming at levels considered safe. This paper explores the generalization of previously adopted good practice policies (GPPs) to bridge the emissions gap between current policies, NDCs ambitions and a well below 2 °C world, facilitating the creation of a bridge trajectory in key major-emitting countries. These GPPs are implemented in eleven well-established national Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) for Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, European Union (EU), India, Indonesia, Japan, Russia, South Korea, and the United States, that provide least-cost, low-carbon scenarios up to 2050. Results show that GPPs can play an important role in each region, with energy supply policies appearing as one of the biggest contributors to the reduction of carbon emissions. However, GPPs by themselves are not enough to close the emission gap, and as such more will be needed in these economies to collectively increase climate action to stabilize global warming at levels considered safe. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词	Bridge scenarios; Climate policy; Good practice policies; Integrated assessment models; Nationally determined contributions
语种	英语
scopus关键词	carbon emission; emission control; European Union; global warming; international agreement; national planning; policy implementation; pollution policy; Australia; Brazil; Canada; China; India; Indonesia; Japan; Russian Federation; South Korea; United States
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/256675
作者单位	Centre for Energy and Environmental Economics (Cenergia), Energy Planning Programme (PPE), COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, PO Box 30314, The Hague, 2500 GH, Netherlands; Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, Utrecht, 3584 CB, Netherlands; E3 Modeling S.A., Panormou 70-72, Athens, Greece; The Center for Research on Energy Policy – Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia; Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States; Energy Research Institute, National Development and Reform Commission, B1505, Guohong Building, Jia.No.11, Muxidibeili, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100038, China; Model Development and Quantitative Research Division, Economic Analysis Directorate, Strategic Policy Branch, Environment and Climate Change, Canada; Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyoto University, C1-3 361, Kyotodai...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Baptista L.B.,Schaeffer R.,van Soest H.L.,et al. Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries[J],2022,73.
APA	Baptista L.B..,Schaeffer R..,van Soest H.L..,Fragkos P..,Rochedo P.R.R..,...&Qimin C..(2022).Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries.Global Environmental Change,73.
MLA	Baptista L.B.,et al."Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries".Global Environmental Change 73(2022).