Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102475 |
Distributive justice in global climate finance – Recipients’ climate vulnerability and the allocation of climate funds | |
Islam M.M. | |
发表日期 | 2022 |
ISSN | 0959-3780 |
卷号 | 73 |
英文摘要 | The ‘climate justice’ lens is increasingly being used in framing discussions and debates on global climate finance. A variant of such justice – distributive justice – emphasises recipient countries’ vulnerability to be an important consideration in funding allocation. The extent to which this principle is pursued in practice has been of widespread and ongoing concerns. Empirical evidence in this regard however remains inadequate and methodologically weak. This research examined the effect of recipients’ climate vulnerability on the allocation of climate funds by controlling for other commonly-identified determinants. A dynamic panel regression method based on Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) was used on a longitudinal dataset, containing approved funds for more than 100,000 projects covering three areas of climate action (mitigation, adaptation, and overlap) in 133 countries over two decades (2000–2018). Findings indicated a non-significant effect of recipients’ vulnerability on mitigation funding, but significant positive effects on adaptation and overlap fundings. ‘Most vulnerable’ countries were likely to receive higher amounts of these two types of funding than the ‘least vulnerable’ countries. All these provided evidence of distributive justice. However, the relationship between vulnerability and funding was parabolic, suggesting ‘moderately vulnerable’ countries likely to receive more funding than the ‘most vulnerable’ countries. Whilst, for mitigation funding, this observation was not a reason for concern, for adaptation and overlap fundings this was not in complete harmony with distributive justice. Paradoxically, countries with better investment readiness were likely to receive more adaptation and overlap funds. In discordance with distributive justice, countries within the Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia regions, despite their higher climatic vulnerabilities, were likely to receive significantly less adaptation and overlap fundings. Effects of vulnerability were persistent, and past funding had significant effects on current funding. These, coupled with the impact of readiness, suggested a probable Low Funding Trap for the world's most vulnerable countries. The overarching conclusion is that, although positive changes have occurred since the 2015 Paris Agreement, considerable challenges to distributive justice remain. Significant data and methodological challenges encountered in the research and their implications are also discussed. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd |
英文关键词 | Climate finance; Climate vulnerability; Distributive climate justice; Dynamic panel regression; System GMM |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | adaptation; global climate; investment; mitigation; regression; Africa; Asia; France; Ile de France; Paris; South Asia; Sub-Saharan Africa; Ville de Paris |
来源期刊 | Global Environmental Change |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/256661 |
作者单位 | Natural Resources Institute (NRI), University of Greenwich, Medway Campus, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, UK, Kent, ME4 4TB, United Kingdom |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Islam M.M.. Distributive justice in global climate finance – Recipients’ climate vulnerability and the allocation of climate funds[J],2022,73. |
APA | Islam M.M..(2022).Distributive justice in global climate finance – Recipients’ climate vulnerability and the allocation of climate funds.Global Environmental Change,73. |
MLA | Islam M.M.."Distributive justice in global climate finance – Recipients’ climate vulnerability and the allocation of climate funds".Global Environmental Change 73(2022). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Islam M.M.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Islam M.M.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Islam M.M.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。