CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s13595-021-01046-3
Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users
Acharya, Ram Prasad; Maraseni, Tek Narayan; Cockfield, Geoff
通讯作者Maraseni, TN (通讯作者),Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Sustainable Agr Syst, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia. ; Maraseni, TN (通讯作者),Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
发表日期2021
ISSN1286-4560
EISSN1297-966X
卷号78期号:2
英文摘要Key message We assessed forest users' willingness to pay (WTP) for regulating and cultural forest services based on their socio-economic status (rich vs. poor), proximity to forests (nearby vs. distant), and forest management modalities (community forestry vs. collaborative forest management). As expected, a huge variation was found in WTP among these sub-groups. The wealthier households (HH) preferred 'cash' whereas poor HHs preferred 'labour' as a payment option. center dot Context Forest's ecosystem services (FES) research have largely concentrated on aggregated economic valuation, while minimal consideration has been paid to distributional issues of willingness to pay (WTP) of many regulating and cultural services such as water quality improvement (WQI), flood control (FC), and bequest and aesthetic values. center dot Aims We assessed WTP of high-priority FES to the various sub-groups (nearby/distant, rich/poor and community/collaborative forest users) and explored the preferred payment options among the sub-groups in the Siwalik landscape of Nepal. center dot Methods We carried out contingent valuation survey of 253 households (ranging from 31 to 33 households from each of the sub-groups). We performed the generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) to analyse the data in RStudio. center dot Results Spatial distance and wealth levels of the respondents play a crucial role in WTP of FES. GLMM analysis indicated that WTP of non-marketed FES differed in terms of cash and labour format. Generally, the WTP is higher in wealthier sub-groups as a cash option. WTP in-terms of labour is a better option for poor HH. center dot Conclusion Disaggregated WTP should be considered while designing future forest management interventions.
关键词CONTINGENT VALUATION METHODCHOICE EXPERIMENTECONOMIC VALUATIONTRADE-OFFSBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATIONAGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPESCOMMUNITY FORESTSDISCRETE-CHOICEWATER-QUALITYBENEFITS
英文关键词Valuation; Economic contribution; Flood control; Water quality improvement; Bequest value; Aesthetic value
语种英语
WOS研究方向Forestry
WOS类目Forestry
WOS记录号WOS:000652248200002
来源期刊ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
来源机构中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/253871
作者单位[Acharya, Ram Prasad; Maraseni, Tek Narayan; Cockfield, Geoff] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Sustainable Agr Syst, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia; [Maraseni, Tek Narayan] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Acharya, Ram Prasad,Maraseni, Tek Narayan,Cockfield, Geoff. Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users[J]. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,2021,78(2).
APA Acharya, Ram Prasad,Maraseni, Tek Narayan,&Cockfield, Geoff.(2021).Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users.ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE,78(2).
MLA Acharya, Ram Prasad,et al."Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users".ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE 78.2(2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Acharya, Ram Prasad]的文章
[Maraseni, Tek Narayan]的文章
[Cockfield, Geoff]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Acharya, Ram Prasad]的文章
[Maraseni, Tek Narayan]的文章
[Cockfield, Geoff]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Acharya, Ram Prasad]的文章
[Maraseni, Tek Narayan]的文章
[Cockfield, Geoff]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。