气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Six modes of co-production for sustainability

CCPortal

DOI	10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
	Six modes of co-production for sustainability
	Chambers J.M.; Wyborn C.; Ryan M.E.; Reid R.S.; Riechers M.; Serban A.; Bennett N.J.; Cvitanovic C.; Fernández-Giménez M.E.; Galvin K.A.; Goldstein B.E.; Klenk N.L.; Tengö M.; Brennan R.; Cockburn J.J.; Hill R.; Munera C.; Nel J.L.; Österblom H.; Bednarek A.T.; Bennett E.M.; Brandeis A.; Charli-Joseph L.; Chatterton P.; Curran K.; Dumrongrojwatthana P.; Durán A.P.; Fada S.J.; Gerber J.-D.; Green J.M.H.; Guerrero A.M.; Haller T.; Horcea-Milcu A.-I.; Leimona B.; Montana J.; Rondeau R.; Spierenburg M.; Steyaert P.; Zaehringer J.G.; Gruby R.; Hutton J.; Pickering T.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	2398-9629
起始页码	983
结束页码	996
卷号	4 期号:11
英文摘要	The promise of co-production to address complex sustainability challenges is compelling. Yet, co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice, encompasses diverse aims, terminologies and practices, with poor clarity over their implications. To explore this diversity, we systematically mapped differences in how 32 initiatives from 6 continents co-produce diverse outcomes for the sustainable development of ecosystems at local to global scales. We found variation in their purpose for utilizing co-production, understanding of power, approach to politics and pathways to impact. A cluster analysis identified six modes of co-production: (1) researching solutions; (2) empowering voices; (3) brokering power; (4) reframing power; (5) navigating differences and (6) reframing agency. No mode is ideal; each holds unique potential to achieve particular outcomes, but also poses unique challenges and risks. Our analysis provides a heuristic tool for researchers and societal actors to critically explore this diversity and effectively navigate trade-offs when co-producing sustainability. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Cluster analysis; Economic and social effects; Co-production; Global scale; Reframing; Trade off; Sustainable development
来源期刊	Nature Sustainability
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/249721
作者单位	Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands; Luc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre, Gland, Switzerland; Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Institute for Water Futures, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States; Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany; Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; The Peopled Seas Initiative, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National UniversityACT, Australia; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia; Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States; Department of Ant...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Chambers J.M.,Wyborn C.,Ryan M.E.,et al. Six modes of co-production for sustainability[J],2021,4(11).
APA	Chambers J.M..,Wyborn C..,Ryan M.E..,Reid R.S..,Riechers M..,...&Pickering T..(2021).Six modes of co-production for sustainability.Nature Sustainability,4(11).
MLA	Chambers J.M.,et al."Six modes of co-production for sustainability".Nature Sustainability 4.11(2021).