CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422
Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
Chambers J.M.; Wyborn C.; Klenk N.L.; Ryan M.; Serban A.; Bennett N.J.; Brennan R.; Charli-Joseph L.; Fernández-Giménez M.E.; Galvin K.A.; Goldstein B.E.; Haller T.; Hill R.; Munera C.; Nel J.L.; Österblom H.; Reid R.S.; Riechers M.; Spierenburg M.; Tengö M.; Bennett E.; Brandeis A.; Chatterton P.; Cockburn J.J.; Cvitanovic C.; Dumrongrojwatthana P.; Paz Durán A.; Gerber J.-D.; Green J.M.H.; Gruby R.; Guerrero A.M.; Horcea-Milcu A.-I.; Montana J.; Steyaert P.; Zaehringer J.G.; Bednarek A.T.; Curran K.; Fada S.J.; Hutton J.; Leimona B.; Pickering T.; Rondeau R.
发表日期2022
ISSN0959-3780
卷号72
英文摘要Co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice by diverse societal actors, is argued to play an important role in sustainability transformations. Yet, there is still poor understanding of how to navigate the tensions that emerge in these processes. Through analyzing 32 initiatives worldwide that co-produced knowledge and action to foster sustainable social-ecological relations, we conceptualize ‘co-productive agility’ as an emergent feature vital for turning tensions into transformations. Co-productive agility refers to the willingness and ability of diverse actors to iteratively engage in reflexive dialogues to grow shared ideas and actions that would not have been possible from the outset. It relies on embedding knowledge production within processes of change to constantly recognize, reposition, and navigate tensions and opportunities. Co-productive agility opens up multiple pathways to transformation through: (1) elevating marginalized agendas in ways that maintain their integrity and broaden struggles for justice; (2) questioning dominant agendas by engaging with power in ways that challenge assumptions, (3) navigating conflicting agendas to actively transform interlinked paradigms, practices, and structures; (4) exploring diverse agendas to foster learning and mutual respect for a plurality of perspectives. We explore six process considerations that vary by these four pathways and provide a framework to enable agility in sustainability transformations. We argue that research and practice spend too much time closing down debate over different agendas for change – thereby avoiding, suppressing, or polarizing tensions, and call for more efforts to facilitate better interactions among different agendas. © 2021 The Author(s)
关键词Co-productionImpactPower relationsSocial-ecological relationsTensionsTransformative processes
语种英语
scopus关键词indigenous knowledge; integrated approach; knowledge; learning; questionnaire survey; sustainability; willingness to pay
来源期刊Global Environmental Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/249530
作者单位Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands; Luc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre, Gland, Switzerland; Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, United Kingdom; Institute for Water Futures, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; The Peopled Seas Initiative, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Trinity Centre for Environmental Humanities, School of Histories and Humanities, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States; Department of Anthropology and Geography, ...
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Chambers J.M.,Wyborn C.,Klenk N.L.,et al. Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations[J],2022,72.
APA Chambers J.M..,Wyborn C..,Klenk N.L..,Ryan M..,Serban A..,...&Rondeau R..(2022).Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations.Global Environmental Change,72.
MLA Chambers J.M.,et al."Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations".Global Environmental Change 72(2022).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Chambers J.M.]的文章
[Wyborn C.]的文章
[Klenk N.L.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Chambers J.M.]的文章
[Wyborn C.]的文章
[Klenk N.L.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Chambers J.M.]的文章
[Wyborn C.]的文章
[Klenk N.L.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。