Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102452 |
The anticipatory governance of sustainability transformations: Hybrid approaches and dominant perspectives | |
Muiderman K.; Zurek M.; Vervoort J.; Gupta A.; Hasnain S.; Driessen P. | |
发表日期 | 2022 |
ISSN | 0959-3780 |
卷号 | 73 |
英文摘要 | Anticipation methods and tools are increasingly used to try to imagine and govern transformations towards more sustainable futures across different policy domains and sectors. But there is a lack of research into the steering effects of anticipation on present-day governance choices, especially in the face of urgently needed sustainability transformations. This paper seeks to understand how different perspectives on anticipatory governance connect to attempts to guide policy and action toward transformative change. We analyze perspectives on anticipatory governance in a global network of food system foresight practitioners (Foresight4Food) – using a workshop, interviews, and a survey as our sources of data. We connect frameworks on anticipatory governance and on transformation to analyse different perspectives on the future and their implications for actions in the present to transform food systems and offer new insights for theory and practice. In the global Foresight4Food network, we find that most foresight practitioners use hybrid approaches to anticipatory governance that combine fundamentally different assumptions about the future. We also find that despite these diverse food futures, anticipation processes predominantly produce recommendations that follow more prediction-oriented forms of strategic planning in order to mitigate future risks. We further demonstrate that much anticipation for transformation uses the language on deep uncertainty and deliberative action without fully taking its consequences on board. Thus, opportunities for transforming future food systems are missed due to these implicit assumptions that dominate the anticipatory governance of food systems. Our combined framework helps researchers and practitioners to be more reflexive of how assumptions about key human systems such as food system futures shape what is prioritized/marginalized and included/excluded in actions to transform such systems. © 2021 The Author(s) |
关键词 | Anticipatory governanceFood systemsForesightPolitics of the futureSustainability transformations |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | action plan; food industry; future prospect; governance approach; mitigation; planning practice; prioritization; questionnaire survey; research work; strategic approach; sustainability; uncertainty analysis |
来源期刊 | Global Environmental Change |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/249518 |
作者单位 | Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, CB Utrecht, 3584, Netherlands; Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom; Research Institute of Humanity and Nature, 457-4 Motoyama, Kamigamo Kita-ku Kyoto, 603-8047, Japan; Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, KN Wageningen, 6706, Netherlands |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Muiderman K.,Zurek M.,Vervoort J.,et al. The anticipatory governance of sustainability transformations: Hybrid approaches and dominant perspectives[J],2022,73. |
APA | Muiderman K.,Zurek M.,Vervoort J.,Gupta A.,Hasnain S.,&Driessen P..(2022).The anticipatory governance of sustainability transformations: Hybrid approaches and dominant perspectives.Global Environmental Change,73. |
MLA | Muiderman K.,et al."The anticipatory governance of sustainability transformations: Hybrid approaches and dominant perspectives".Global Environmental Change 73(2022). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。