CCPortal
DOI10.5194/acp-20-6707-2020
Comparison of south-east Atlantic aerosol direct radiative effect over clouds from SCIAMACHY, POLDER and OMI-MODIS
De Graaf M.; Schulte R.; Peers F.; Waquet F.; Gijsbert Tilstra L.; Stammes P.
发表日期2020
ISSN1680-7316
起始页码6707
结束页码6723
卷号20期号:11
英文摘要

The direct radiative effect (DRE) of aerosols above clouds has been found to be significant over the south-east Atlantic Ocean during the African biomass burning season due to elevated smoke layers absorbing radiation above the cloud deck. So far, global climate models have been unsuccessful in reproducing the high DRE values measured by various satellite instruments. Meanwhile, the radiative effects by aerosols have been identified as the largest source of uncertainty in global climate models. In this paper, three independent satellite datasets of DRE during the biomass burning season in 2006 are compared to constrain the south-east Atlantic radiation budget. The DRE of aerosols above clouds is derived from the spectrometer SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY), the polarimeter Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances (POLDER), and collocated measurements by the spectrometer Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and the imager Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). All three datasets confirm the high DRE values during the biomass season, underlining the relevance of local aerosol effects. Differences between the instruments can be attributed mainly to sampling issues. When these are accounted for, the remaining differences can be explained by a higher cloud optical thickness (COT) derived from POLDER compared to the other instruments and a neglect of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at shortwave infrared (SWIR) wavelengths in the method used for SCIAMACHY and OMI-MODIS. The higher COT from POLDER by itself can explain the difference found in DRE between POLDER and the other instruments. The AOT underestimation is mainly evident at high values of the aerosol DRE and accounts for about a third of the difference between POLDER and OMI-MODIS DRE. The datasets from POLDER and OMI-MODIS effectively provide lower and upper bounds for the aerosol DRE over clouds over the south-east Atlantic, which can be used to challenge global circulation models (GCMs). Comparisons of model and satellite datasets should also account for sampling issues. The complementary DRE retrievals from OMI-MODIS and POLDER may benefit from upcoming satellite missions that combine spectrometer and polarimeter measurements.

. © Author(s) 2020.
语种英语
scopus关键词aerosol; biomass burning; climate modeling; cloud radiative forcing; comparative study; data set; MODIS; POLDER; radiation budget; satellite data; SCIAMACHY; Atlantic Ocean; Atlantic Ocean (Southeast)
来源期刊ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/247729
作者单位Satellite Observations Department, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, Netherlands; Geosciences and Remote Sensing Department, Delft University of Technology (TUD), Delft, Netherlands; University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom; Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille 1, Lille, France
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
De Graaf M.,Schulte R.,Peers F.,et al. Comparison of south-east Atlantic aerosol direct radiative effect over clouds from SCIAMACHY, POLDER and OMI-MODIS[J],2020,20(11).
APA De Graaf M.,Schulte R.,Peers F.,Waquet F.,Gijsbert Tilstra L.,&Stammes P..(2020).Comparison of south-east Atlantic aerosol direct radiative effect over clouds from SCIAMACHY, POLDER and OMI-MODIS.ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS,20(11).
MLA De Graaf M.,et al."Comparison of south-east Atlantic aerosol direct radiative effect over clouds from SCIAMACHY, POLDER and OMI-MODIS".ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 20.11(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[De Graaf M.]的文章
[Schulte R.]的文章
[Peers F.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[De Graaf M.]的文章
[Schulte R.]的文章
[Peers F.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[De Graaf M.]的文章
[Schulte R.]的文章
[Peers F.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。