CCPortal
DOI10.1126/science.abi4573
Allow "nonuse rights" to conserve natural resources
Leonard B.; Regan S.; Costello C.; Kerr S.; Parker D.P.; Plantinga A.J.; Salzman J.; Smith V.K.; Stoellinger T.
发表日期2021
ISSN0036-8075
起始页码958
结束页码961
卷号373期号:6558
英文摘要Market approaches to environmental conservation, by which mechanisms such as property rights, prices, and contracts are used to advance environmental goals, have gained traction globally in recent decades (1). But in many cases, antiquated rules limit their role in conserving public natural resources. "Use-it-or-lose-it" requirements, together with narrow definitions of eligible "uses," can preclude environmental groups from participating in markets for natural resources. These restrictions can bias resource management in favor of extractive users, even when conservation interests are willing to pay more to protect resources from development. We argue that acquisition of public natural resource rights for the purpose of withholding them from development should be allowed. Policies should be reformed to include conservation as a legally valid form of "use." Allowing such "nonuse rights" to public natural resources would enable markets to advance environmental goals, leading to more stable and less contentious outcomes. Use-it-or-lose-it rules are legally mandated for many publicly managed resources, meaning that rights to the resource are granted on the condition that the resource be exploited. For example, at least 16 of 37 Nonuse rights have been thwarted on public lands in areas such as southern Utah, shown here. © 2021 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.
英文关键词assessment method; natural resource; public space; resource management; Sustainable Development Goal; article; natural resource; Utah; United States; Utah
语种英语
来源期刊Science
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/244499
作者单位School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; Property and Environment Research Center, Bozeman, MT, United States; Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, United States; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, United States; Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Economics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States; College of Law, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Leonard B.,Regan S.,Costello C.,et al. Allow "nonuse rights" to conserve natural resources[J],2021,373(6558).
APA Leonard B..,Regan S..,Costello C..,Kerr S..,Parker D.P..,...&Stoellinger T..(2021).Allow "nonuse rights" to conserve natural resources.Science,373(6558).
MLA Leonard B.,et al."Allow "nonuse rights" to conserve natural resources".Science 373.6558(2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Leonard B.]的文章
[Regan S.]的文章
[Costello C.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Leonard B.]的文章
[Regan S.]的文章
[Costello C.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Leonard B.]的文章
[Regan S.]的文章
[Costello C.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。