Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102262 |
The economics of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) deployment in a 1.5 °C or 2 °C world | |
Fajardy M.; Morris J.; Gurgel A.; Herzog H.; Mac Dowell N.; Paltsev S. | |
发表日期 | 2021 |
ISSN | 9593780 |
卷号 | 68 |
英文摘要 | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and afforestation are key negative emission technologies suggested in many studies under 2 °C or 1.5 °C scenarios. However, these large-scale land-based approaches have raised concerns about their economic impacts, particularly their impact on food prices, as well as their environmental impacts. Here we focus on quantifying the potential scale of BECCS and its impact on the economy, taking into account technology and economic considerations, but excluding sustainability and political aspects. To do so, we represent all major components of BECCS technology in the MIT Economic Projection and Policy Analysis model. We find that BECCS could make a substantial contribution to emissions reductions in the second half of the century under 1.5 and 2 °C climate stabilization goals, with its deployment driven by revenues from carbon dioxide permits. Results show that global economic costs and the carbon prices needed to hit the stabilization targets are substantially lower with the technology available, and BECCS acts as a true backstop technology at carbon prices around $240 per tonne of carbon dioxide. If driven by economics alone, BECCS deployment increases the use of productive land for bioenergy production, causing substantial land use changes. However, the projected impact on commodity prices is quite limited at the global scale, with global commodity price indices increasing by less than 5% on average. The effect is larger at the regional scale (up to 15% in selected regions), though significantly lower than previous estimates. While BECCS deployment is likely to be constrained for environmental and/or political reasons, this study shows that the large-scale deployment of BECCS is not detrimental to agricultural commodity prices and could reduce the costs of meeting stabilization targets. Still, it is crucial that policies consider carbon dioxide removal as a complement to drastic carbon dioxide emissions reductions, while establishing a credible accounting system and sustainable limits on BECCS. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd |
英文关键词 | afforestation; bioenergy; carbon emission; carbon sequestration; commodity price; cost analysis; emission control; environmental economics; land use change; temperature effect; Trachinotus falcatus |
语种 | 英语 |
来源期刊 | Global Environmental Change
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/205500 |
作者单位 | Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 1NA, United Kingdom; Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States; MIT Energy Initiative, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Fajardy M.,Morris J.,Gurgel A.,et al. The economics of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) deployment in a 1.5 °C or 2 °C world[J],2021,68. |
APA | Fajardy M.,Morris J.,Gurgel A.,Herzog H.,Mac Dowell N.,&Paltsev S..(2021).The economics of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) deployment in a 1.5 °C or 2 °C world.Global Environmental Change,68. |
MLA | Fajardy M.,et al."The economics of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) deployment in a 1.5 °C or 2 °C world".Global Environmental Change 68(2021). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。