气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111920
	Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?
	Stawska A.; Romero N.; de Weerdt M.; Verzijlbergh R.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	03014215
卷号	148
英文摘要	The growing capacity of intermittent energy sources causes more frequent system imbalances as well as congestion. Demand flexibility is a valuable resource that can be used to resolve these. Unfortunately, flexibility can also contribute to congestion, particularly when used to balance the grid. Using flexibility to solve grid problems without creating new ones requires well-designed financial incentives. Congestion management mechanisms (CMMs) are a primary example of such incentives. The question is which of these is most effective in preventing congestion with minimal impact on trading on the imbalance market. This question is answered by comparing traditional CMMs such as grid tariffs to a local flexibility market on their impact on the load in the grid and the lost value of flexibility on the imbalance market. This analysis shows that energy tariffs are not suited for preventing congestion. Capacity tariffs are able to prevent congestion but they impose limitations on the consumer which significantly reduce the value of flexibility on the imbalance market. The flexibility market, an example of a local market, is effective if aggregators do not have a position day ahead or if the distribution system operator limits the buying of flexibility a day before delivery. © 2020 The Author(s)
关键词	Congestion Demand response Energy flexibility Flexibility market Grid tariffs Imbalance market
英文关键词	Energy policy; Congestion management; Demand response; Distribution systems; Financial incentives; Grid balancing; Grid problems; Intermittent energy source; Local flexibility; Commerce; comparative study; demand analysis; energy market; energy resource; market conditions; tariff structure
语种	英语
来源期刊	Energy Policy
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/205353
作者单位	Department of Software Technology, TU Delft, Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6, XE Delft, 2628, Netherlands; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft, Jaffalaan 5, BX Delft, 2628, Netherlands; Priogen, Radarweg 60, NT Amsterdam, 1043, Netherlands
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Stawska A.,Romero N.,de Weerdt M.,et al. Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?[J],2021,148.
APA	Stawska A.,Romero N.,de Weerdt M.,&Verzijlbergh R..(2021).Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?.Energy Policy,148.
MLA	Stawska A.,et al."Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?".Energy Policy 148(2021).