Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111591 |
How market design shapes the spatial distribution of power plant curtailment costs | |
Steinhäuser J.M.; Eisenack K. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 03014215 |
卷号 | 144 |
英文摘要 | When multiple power plants are curtailed at the same time and in the same region, electricity system costs rise. If transmission lines are congested, these costs might be amplified and spatially more concentrated, because there are less spatial spill-overs. We study how such costs and their distribution depend on the market design (nodal pricing or uniform pricing). We extend the literature on curtailment by considering space and market design, and the literature on market design by considering curtailment. We expose a DC load-flow model for Germany to severe correlated curtailment scenarios. We find that additional costs are moderate. For the simulated week, curtailment of 9.3% non-renewable capacity reduces welfare by 2.7% (uniform pricing). With nodal pricing, welfare loss can be reduced by 1.5%. Distributional differences are multiple times larger. For nodal pricing, producer surplus rises more, and costs are spatially more concentrated at the curtailed power plants. Consumer surplus becomes lower. The difference is unlikely to justify changes of the current market design. If also wind or photovoltaic feed-in is unavailable, economic impacts can decrease or increase, but remain in the same order of magnitude. The spatial electricity system structure matters more than the volume of curtailment. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd |
关键词 | CongestionGermanyHeat waveNodal pricingRenewablesResilience |
英文关键词 | Commerce; Electric load flow; Power generation; Power plants; Additional costs; Consumer surplus; DC load-flow model; Economic impacts; Electricity system; Market design; Producer surplus; Uniform pricing; Costs; electricity supply; energy market; power plant; spatial distribution; Germany |
语种 | 英语 |
来源期刊 | Energy Policy |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/204872 |
作者单位 | Jahnstraße 20, Kevelaer, 47623, Germany; Resource Economics Group, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Untern den Linden 6, Berlin, 10099, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Steinhäuser J.M.,Eisenack K.. How market design shapes the spatial distribution of power plant curtailment costs[J],2020,144. |
APA | Steinhäuser J.M.,&Eisenack K..(2020).How market design shapes the spatial distribution of power plant curtailment costs.Energy Policy,144. |
MLA | Steinhäuser J.M.,et al."How market design shapes the spatial distribution of power plant curtailment costs".Energy Policy 144(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Steinhäuser J.M.]的文章 |
[Eisenack K.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Steinhäuser J.M.]的文章 |
[Eisenack K.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Steinhäuser J.M.]的文章 |
[Eisenack K.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。