气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): On the socio-technical potential for onshore wind in Europe: A response to Enevoldsen et al. (2019), Energy Policy, 132, 1092-1100

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111693
	On the socio-technical potential for onshore wind in Europe: A response to Enevoldsen et al. (2019), Energy Policy, 132, 1092-1100
	McKenna R.; Ryberg D.S.; Staffell I.; Hahmann A.N.; Schmidt J.; Heinrichs H.; Höltinger S.; Lilliestam J.; Pfenninger S.; Robinius M.; Stolten D.; Tröndle T.; Wehrle S.; Weinand J.M.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	03014215
卷号	145
英文摘要	A recent article in this journal claimed to assess the socio-technical potential for onshore wind energy in Europe. We find the article to be severely flawed and raise concerns in five general areas. Firstly, the term socio-technical is not precisely defined, and is used by the authors to refer to a potential that others term as merely technical. Secondly, the study fails to account for over a decade of research in wind energy resource assessments. Thirdly, there are multiple issues with the use of input data and, because the study is opaque about many details, the effect of these errors cannot be reproduced. Fourthly, the method assumes a very high wind turbine capacity density of 10.73 MW/km2 across 40% of the land area in Europe with a generic 30% capacity factor. Fifthly, the authors find an implausibly high onshore wind potential, with 120% more capacity and 70% more generation than the highest results given elsewhere in the literature. Overall, we conclude that new research at higher spatial resolutions can make a valuable contribution to wind resource potential assessments. However, due to the missing literature review, the lack of transparency and the overly simplistic methodology, Enevoldsen et al. (2019) potentially mislead fellow scientists, policy makers and the general public. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
关键词	Barriers Feasibility Onshore wind Public acceptance Resource assessment
英文关键词	Energy policy; Capacity factors; General publics; Literature reviews; Multiple issue; Sociotechnical; Spatial resolution; Wind energy resource assessments; Wind resources; Wind power
语种	英语
来源期刊	Energy Policy
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/204774
作者单位	Energy Systems Analysis, DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark; School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom; Institute for Techno-economic Systems Analysis (IEK-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany; Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark; Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany; Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chair of Energy Economics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	McKenna R.,Ryberg D.S.,Staffell I.,et al. On the socio-technical potential for onshore wind in Europe: A response to Enevoldsen et al. (2019), Energy Policy, 132, 1092-1100[J],2020,145.
APA	McKenna R..,Ryberg D.S..,Staffell I..,Hahmann A.N..,Schmidt J..,...&Weinand J.M..(2020).On the socio-technical potential for onshore wind in Europe: A response to Enevoldsen et al. (2019), Energy Policy, 132, 1092-1100.Energy Policy,145.
MLA	McKenna R.,et al."On the socio-technical potential for onshore wind in Europe: A response to Enevoldsen et al. (2019), Energy Policy, 132, 1092-1100".Energy Policy 145(2020).