CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111599
Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison
Huntington H.G.; Bhargava A.; Daniels D.; Weyant J.P.; Avraam C.; Bistline J.; Edmonds J.A.; Giarola S.; Hawkes A.; Hansen M.; Johnston P.; Molar-Cruz A.; Nadew M.; Siddiqui S.; Vaillancourt K.; Victor N.
发表日期2020
ISSN03014215
卷号144
英文摘要Within Canada, Mexico or the United States, policy-making organizations are evaluating energy markets and energy trade within their own borders often by ignoring how these countries’ energy systems are integrated with each other. These analytical gaps provided the main motivation for the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 34 study on North American energy integration and trade. This paper compares North American results from 17 models and discusses their policy motivation. Oil and natural gas production in the three major countries are modestly sensitive to crude oil and natural gas price changes, although these elasticities are below unity. Carbon taxes displace coal and some natural gas with renewables within all three power markets. Lower natural gas prices replace coal and some renewables with natural gas within electric generation. Higher intermittent renewable penetration in the power sector displaces coal and some natural gas. A key conclusion is that much remains to be done in integrating future analyses and in sharing and improving the quality and consistency of the underlying data. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
关键词Data sharingEnergy market integrationEnergy transitionsModel comparison
英文关键词Coal; Commerce; Crude oil price; Energy policy; Gas industry; Gases; Motivation; Natural gas; Natural gas well production; Petroleum industry; Public policy; Electric generation; Energy integration; Energy markets; Energy systems; Natural gas price; North American; Oil and natural gas; Oil and natural gas productions; Coal industry; alternative energy; electricity generation; energy market; energy policy; numerical model; price dynamics; scenario analysis; Canada; Mexico [North America]; United States
语种英语
来源期刊Energy Policy
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/204706
作者单位Stanford University, United States; Canada Energy Regulator, Canada; US Energy Information Administration, United States; Johns Hopkins University, United States; Electric Power Research Institute, United States; Joint Global Change Research Institute, United States; Imperial College London, United Kingdom; Environment and Climate Change, Canada; Technical University of Munich, Germany; American University, United States; ESMIA Consultants, Canada; National Energy Technology Laboratory, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Huntington H.G.,Bhargava A.,Daniels D.,et al. Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison[J],2020,144.
APA Huntington H.G..,Bhargava A..,Daniels D..,Weyant J.P..,Avraam C..,...&Victor N..(2020).Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison.Energy Policy,144.
MLA Huntington H.G.,et al."Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison".Energy Policy 144(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Huntington H.G.]的文章
[Bhargava A.]的文章
[Daniels D.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Huntington H.G.]的文章
[Bhargava A.]的文章
[Daniels D.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Huntington H.G.]的文章
[Bhargava A.]的文章
[Daniels D.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。