气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Reply to the discussion paper by P. Sümegi and S. Gulyás: Some notes on the interpretation and reliability of malacological proxies in paleotemperature reconstructions from loess- comments to Obreht et al.'s “A critical reevaluation of paleoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin”

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103737
	Reply to the discussion paper by P. Sümegi and S. Gulyás: Some notes on the interpretation and reliability of malacological proxies in paleotemperature reconstructions from loess- comments to Obreht et al.'s “A critical reevaluation of paleoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin”
	Obreht I.; Zeeden C.; Hambach U.; Veres D.; Marković S.B.; Lehmkuhl F.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	00128252
卷号	220
英文摘要	In their discussion paper, Sümegi & Gulyás (2021) expressed their concerns about our remarks regarding the reliability of malacothermometer-based July paleotemperature reconstructions for the Carpathian Basin as published in Obreht et al. (2019). We are content to see that our paper inspired the continuation of the discussion, however, we have some concerns about the criticism expressed by Sümegi and Gulyás (2021), which we in this reply address. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
关键词	Carpathian Basin Crvenka Loess Malacothermometry Reply
英文关键词	loess; paleobiogeography; proxy climate record; reconstruction; temperature anomaly; Carpathian Basin
语种	英语
来源期刊	Earth Science Reviews
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/204108
作者单位	Organic Geochemistry Group, MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences and Department of Geosciences, University of Bremen, Leobener Str. 8, Bremen, 28359, Germany; LIAG, Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, Hannover, 30655, Germany; BayCEER & Chair of Geomorphology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 95440, Germany; Romanian Academy, Institute of Speleology, Cluj-Napoca, 400006, Romania; Physical Geography, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia; Department of Geography, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, Aachen, 52056, Germany
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Obreht I.,Zeeden C.,Hambach U.,等. Reply to the discussion paper by P. Sümegi and S. Gulyás: Some notes on the interpretation and reliability of malacological proxies in paleotemperature reconstructions from loess- comments to Obreht et al.'s “A critical reevaluation of paleoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin”[J],2021,220.
APA	Obreht I.,Zeeden C.,Hambach U.,Veres D.,Marković S.B.,&Lehmkuhl F..(2021).Reply to the discussion paper by P. Sümegi and S. Gulyás: Some notes on the interpretation and reliability of malacological proxies in paleotemperature reconstructions from loess- comments to Obreht et al.'s “A critical reevaluation of paleoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin”.Earth Science Reviews,220.
MLA	Obreht I.,et al."Reply to the discussion paper by P. Sümegi and S. Gulyás: Some notes on the interpretation and reliability of malacological proxies in paleotemperature reconstructions from loess- comments to Obreht et al.'s “A critical reevaluation of paleoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin”".Earth Science Reviews 220(2021).