CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103294
How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review
Eriyagama N.; Smakhtin V.; Udamulla L.
发表日期2020
ISSN00128252
卷号208
英文摘要A key question in sustainable development is how much alteration in natural systems, such as river basins, is acceptable? One of the ways by which humans alter a river basin is by building water storage infrastructure. While storage reservoirs deliver numerous benefits, they can also induce social and environmental costs by displacing people, fragmenting river networks and altering downstream flow regimes. In such a context, merely capping total water withdrawal from rivers for human consumption is not sufficient. River basin plans should also identify optimal (acceptable) limits to surface storage capacities, and optimal numbers, degrees of distribution and locations of storage infrastructure. It remains largely unclear, however, whether it is possible to define a hydrologically, ecologically and socially justified ‘surface water storage boundary’ for a river basin. An associated question is what would be the ‘best’ arrangement of this bounding storage capacity in the basins river network (in terms of numbers, sizes and locations of reservoirs) to maximize water storage benefits and minimize environmental and social costs. The main objective of this review is to examine contemporary knowledge on surface water storage development with a focus on tools and approaches that may help to answer the above questions of a ‘surface water storage boundary’ and its ‘optimum arrangement’ for a river basin. In order to achieve this objective, our review introduces two novel concepts: the ‘storage scale’ and the ‘sustainable storage development framework.’ The ‘storage scale’ has four elements – capacity, number, distribution and location – individual scales that help visualize a ‘surface water storage boundary’ and its ‘optimum arrangement’ for a typical river basin. The ‘sustainable storage development framework’ consists of three dimensions – economic benefits, ecosystems and society- and a set of indicators quantifying each dimension. This review shows that optimal levels of the elements of the ‘storage scale’ may be identified using the ‘sustainable storage development framework’. © 2020 The Author(s)
关键词DamsEcological impactsEcological integrityReservoirsSocial impactsSocial responsibilityStorage benefitsSurface water storageSustainable development
英文关键词river basin; surface water; sustainable development; water management; water storage
语种英语
来源期刊Earth Science Reviews
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/203697
作者单位International Water Management Institute (IWMI), P.O. Box 2075, Colombo, Sri Lanka; UNU Institute for Water Environment and Health, 204 – 175, Longwood Road South, Hamilton, ON L8P 0A1, Canada; Open University of Sri Lanka, P. O. Box 21, Nawala, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Eriyagama N.,Smakhtin V.,Udamulla L.. How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review[J],2020,208.
APA Eriyagama N.,Smakhtin V.,&Udamulla L..(2020).How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review.Earth Science Reviews,208.
MLA Eriyagama N.,et al."How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review".Earth Science Reviews 208(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Eriyagama N.]的文章
[Smakhtin V.]的文章
[Udamulla L.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Eriyagama N.]的文章
[Smakhtin V.]的文章
[Udamulla L.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Eriyagama N.]的文章
[Smakhtin V.]的文章
[Udamulla L.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。