Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103294 |
How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review | |
Eriyagama N.; Smakhtin V.; Udamulla L. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 00128252 |
卷号 | 208 |
英文摘要 | A key question in sustainable development is how much alteration in natural systems, such as river basins, is acceptable? One of the ways by which humans alter a river basin is by building water storage infrastructure. While storage reservoirs deliver numerous benefits, they can also induce social and environmental costs by displacing people, fragmenting river networks and altering downstream flow regimes. In such a context, merely capping total water withdrawal from rivers for human consumption is not sufficient. River basin plans should also identify optimal (acceptable) limits to surface storage capacities, and optimal numbers, degrees of distribution and locations of storage infrastructure. It remains largely unclear, however, whether it is possible to define a hydrologically, ecologically and socially justified ‘surface water storage boundary’ for a river basin. An associated question is what would be the ‘best’ arrangement of this bounding storage capacity in the basins river network (in terms of numbers, sizes and locations of reservoirs) to maximize water storage benefits and minimize environmental and social costs. The main objective of this review is to examine contemporary knowledge on surface water storage development with a focus on tools and approaches that may help to answer the above questions of a ‘surface water storage boundary’ and its ‘optimum arrangement’ for a river basin. In order to achieve this objective, our review introduces two novel concepts: the ‘storage scale’ and the ‘sustainable storage development framework.’ The ‘storage scale’ has four elements – capacity, number, distribution and location – individual scales that help visualize a ‘surface water storage boundary’ and its ‘optimum arrangement’ for a typical river basin. The ‘sustainable storage development framework’ consists of three dimensions – economic benefits, ecosystems and society- and a set of indicators quantifying each dimension. This review shows that optimal levels of the elements of the ‘storage scale’ may be identified using the ‘sustainable storage development framework’. © 2020 The Author(s) |
关键词 | DamsEcological impactsEcological integrityReservoirsSocial impactsSocial responsibilityStorage benefitsSurface water storageSustainable development |
英文关键词 | river basin; surface water; sustainable development; water management; water storage |
语种 | 英语 |
来源期刊 | Earth Science Reviews
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/203697 |
作者单位 | International Water Management Institute (IWMI), P.O. Box 2075, Colombo, Sri Lanka; UNU Institute for Water Environment and Health, 204 – 175, Longwood Road South, Hamilton, ON L8P 0A1, Canada; Open University of Sri Lanka, P. O. Box 21, Nawala, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Eriyagama N.,Smakhtin V.,Udamulla L.. How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review[J],2020,208. |
APA | Eriyagama N.,Smakhtin V.,&Udamulla L..(2020).How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review.Earth Science Reviews,208. |
MLA | Eriyagama N.,et al."How much artificial surface storage is acceptable in a river basin and where should it be located: A review".Earth Science Reviews 208(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。